Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
AVDV vs ITOT: how they differ
AVDV and ITOT hold 1% of their weight in the same names, and AVDV returned more over the year.
Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, AVDV and ITOT hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | AVDV | ITOT |
|---|---|---|
| Webuild SpA | 0.17% | 0.10% |
| d'Amico International Shipping SA | 0.10% | 0.25% |
| Perseus Mining Ltd | 0.63% | 0.06% |
| Resolute Mining Ltd | 0.34% | 0.06% |
| Panoro Energy ASA | 0.02% | 0.02% |
| Cuscal Ltd | 0.01% | 0.04% |
| AMG Critical Materials NV | 0.06% | 0.01% |
| Air New Zealand Ltd | 0.08% | 0.01% |
| Austal Ltd | 0.02% | 0.01% |
| Australian Finance Group Ltd | 0.01% | 0.01% |
| Billerud Aktiebolag | 0.14% | 0.01% |
| Computacenter PLC | 0.38% | 0.01% |
| Only in AVDV | Only in ITOT |
|---|---|
| AT&S Austria Technologie & Systemtechnik 1.72% | NVIDIA 7.32% |
| Mitsui Kinzoku Co Ltd 1.38% | APPLE 6.63% |
| Clal Insurance Enterprises Holdings Ltd 0.74% | MICROSOFT 5.06% |
| Hudbay Minerals Inc 0.67% | AMAZON.COM INC 3.41% |
| OceanaGold Corp 0.63% | ALPHABET CLASS A 2.70% |
| Coeur Mining Inc 0.61% | BROADCOM INC 2.37% |
| Whitehaven Coal Ltd 0.61% | ALPHABET CLASS C 2.16% |
| B2Gold Corp 0.59% | META PLATFORMS CLASS A 1.96% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Sep 10, 2026.
| AVDV Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF | ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Avantis | iShares |
| What it is | International Small Cap Value | Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market |
| Total return, 1 year | +31.0% | +17.2% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +13.5 pts | −0.3 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.36% | 0.03% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 88.3% |
| Holdings | 1751 | 1167 |
AVDV in plain words
AVDV is an index equity fund tracking the International Small Cap Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +31.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.36% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1751 positions, with the top ten at 8.2%.
ITOT in plain words
ITOT is an index equity fund tracking the Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1167 positions, with the top ten at 34.6%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, AVDV or ITOT?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AVDV returned +31.0% and ITOT returned +17.2%, so AVDV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, AVDV or ITOT?
- AVDV charges 0.36% a year and ITOT charges 0.03%, so ITOT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do AVDV and ITOT overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 0% of AVDV and 88% of ITOT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 1% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, AVDV against ITOT, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/avdv-vs-itot Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources