Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

APLY vs QQQ: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, APLY returned +18.2% to QQQ's +15.2%, and QQQ charges 0.18% to APLY's 1.04%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about APLY and QQQ

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $112m for YieldMax AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF and $483.0bn for Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1.

At a glance
+18.2%
APLY total return, 1 year
+15.2%
QQQ total return, 1 year
1.04%
APLY expense ratio
0.18%
QQQ expense ratio

Pair scorecard

QQQ costs 0.86 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 3.0 points; QQQ is far larger, $483.0bn against $112m.

APLY vs QQQ: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureAPLYQQQ
Return
Total return, 1 year+18.2%+15.2%
Price change, 1 yearfell 14.2%rose 14.6%
Latest payout, annualized20.9%
Drawdown
Below its high4.5%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Against its benchmark
What it tracksBenchmark: Apple (AAPL)Nasdaq-100 Index
Against its benchmark, same daysbehind by 10.1 pts
Cost and size
Expense ratio1.04%0.18%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$112m$483.0bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight96%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund46.7%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026 and Oct 28, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Apr 28, 2023 to Oct 23, 2026 · 182 weekly returns
APLY QQQ
Return
Total return edge QQQ +61.3% +122.7%
Annualized edge QQQ +14.6% +25.7%
Price return edge QQQ −41.2% +118.4%
Risk
Volatility edge QQQ (slight) 21.0% 19.1%
Max drawdown edge QQQ −24.1% −21.3%
Downside capture 91.8% 100.2%
Beta 0.78 1.00
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge QQQ 0.54 1.05
Sortino edge QQQ 0.73 1.65
Treynor 0.145 0.145
Calmar edge QQQ 0.61 1.20
Against the benchmark
Alpha −4.1% a year −0.1% a year
Alpha t-stat −1.45 −0.58
Information ratio −1.09 −0.10
Tracking error 7.8% 0.4%

Each against its own benchmark: APLY against AAPL, Apr 28, 2023 to Oct 23, 2026; QQQ against QQQM, Oct 23, 2020 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

QQQ returned more: +122.7% to +61.3%. QQQ swung slightly less: 19.1% to 21.0%. QQQ fell less at its worst: −21.3% to −24.1%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: APLY vs QQQ: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureAPLYQQQEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+61.3%+122.7%QQQPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+14.6%+25.7%QQQTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return−41.2%+118.4%QQQPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility21.0%19.1%QQQ (slight)Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation15.5%12.2%QQQLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−24.1%−21.3%QQQDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture66.1%100.4%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture91.8%100.2%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta0.781.00Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.941.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.541.05QQQReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.731.65QQQReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1450.145Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.611.20QQQAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkAAPLQQQMThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha−4.1% a year−0.1% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat−1.45−0.58Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−9.7% to +1.5%−0.4% to +0.2%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio−1.09−0.10Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error7.8%0.4%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 182 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, APLY and QQQ hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026 and Oct 28, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first APLY QQQ
Only in one fund ↓
Only in APLY
United States Treasury Note/Bond 3.375% 09/15/2027 26.10%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 2.375% 05/15/2027 13.93%
AAPL 12/18/2026 310.01 C 11.68%
AAPL US 10/30/26 C352.5 0.03%
AAPL US 10/30/26 C355 0.02%
AAPL US 10/30/26 C350 -0.12%
AAPL US 10/30/26 C347.5 -0.13%
AAPL 12/18/2026 310.01 P -0.86%
Only in QQQ
NVIDIA Corp 8.17%
Apple Inc 7.88%
Microsoft Corp 6.14%
Micron Technology Inc 4.50%
Amazon.com Inc 4.25%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc 3.93%
Tesla Inc 3.33%
Alphabet Inc 2.92%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

APLY YieldMax AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF QQQ Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Where it sits Income ETF Stock ETF
What it is synthetic covered call, vs AAPL Tracks the Nasdaq-100
Total return, 1 year +18.2% +15.2%
Its benchmark over the same days +28.3% (AAPL) +15.2% (QQQM)
Gap to its benchmark −10.1 pts vs AAPL 0.0 pts vs QQQM
Cash paid, 1 year 28.6% not an income fund
Expense ratio 1.04% 0.18%
Holdings not read by ETFIQ 103
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $112m $483.0bn

APLY and QQQ on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-CB71FA316B

APLY and QQQ do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. APLY is measured against Apple (AAPL) and QQQ follows Nasdaq-100 Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 28, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 APLY returned +18.2% and QQQ +15.2% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 3.0 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

APLY and QQQ flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
APLY

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, APLY paid 28.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 14.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +18.2%. Apple (AAPL) returned +28.3% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 10.1 pts. At its price on Oct 28, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 20.9%, paid weekly.

QQQ

QQQ tracks the Nasdaq-100. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.2% with distributions reinvested, against +15.2% for its benchmark, the Nasdaq-100 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 103 positions, with the top ten at 46.7%. It sat 4.5% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Are APLY and QQQ in the same category?
APLY is an option-income ETF and QQQ is a stock ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
Which returned more over the last year, APLY or QQQ?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, APLY returned +18.2% and QQQ +15.2%.
Which is cheaper, APLY or QQQ?
QQQ is cheaper, by 0.86 percentage points a year. That is about $86 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, APLY against QQQ, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/aply-vs-qqq

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.