Data as of Nov 12, 2026.
APCB vs GVI: Differences, Returns & Fees
Return, fees and overlap, side by side.
Risk and return
May 12, 2023 to Nov 6, 2026 · 182 weekly returnsEach against its own benchmark: APCB against AGG, May 12, 2023 to Nov 5, 2026; GVI against IUSB, Jun 20, 2014 to Nov 6, 2026.
From May 2023 to Nov 2026, GVI returned more: +12.3% to +10.5%. GVI swung less: 3.4% to 4.8%. GVI fell less at its worst: −3.1% to −5.4%.
Full scorecard
19 measures Open ↓
| Measure | APCB | GVI | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +10.5% | +12.3% | GVI | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +2.9% | +3.4% | GVI | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | −4.2% | −0.3% | GVI | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 4.8% | 3.4% | GVI | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 3.4% | 2.4% | GVI | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −5.4% | −3.1% | GVI | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Upside capture | 90.2% | 63.3% | Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose. | |
| Downside capture | 91.1% | 64.2% | Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better. | |
| Beta | 0.90 | 0.61 | Not an edge | How far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves. |
| R squared | 0.98 | 0.87 | Not an edge | Share of its weekly moves its benchmark explains. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | −0.33 | −0.36 | APCB (slight) | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | −0.46 | −0.50 | APCB (slight) | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Treynor | −0.018 | −0.002 | Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta. | |
| Calmar | 0.53 | 1.10 | GVI | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
| Against the benchmark | ||||
| Benchmark | AGG | IUSB | The ETF each fund is measured against. | |
| Alpha | −0.3% a year | −0.2% a year | Not significant | Yearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts. |
| Alpha t-stat | −0.64 | −0.71 | Not an edge | How sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance. |
| Alpha range | −1.0% to +0.5% | −0.9% to +0.4% | Includes zero | The 95% range for the yearly alpha. |
| Information ratio | −0.13 | −0.13 | Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error. | |
| Tracking error | 0.9% | 2.3% | Not an edge | How far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 182 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
Pair scorecard
GVI costs 0.16 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 1.1 points.
| Measure | APCB | GVI |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | −1.3% | −0.2% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 3.2%, high on Feb 27, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | Bloomberg U.S. Intermediate Government/Credit Bond Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.36% | 0.20% |
| Net assets, APCB as of Aug 31, 2026 and GVI as of Nov 12, 2026 | $1.0bn | $3.8bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 17% | |
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, APCB and GVI hold 17% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026.
half
17% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
APCB and GVI on the fields both publish, as of Nov 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
Client brief:
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
APCB
APCB is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Nov 12, 2026 it returned −1.3% with distributions reinvested, against −1.3% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.36% a year. It sat 3.2% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Nov 12, 2026.
GVI
GVI tracks an index. Over the year to Nov 12, 2026 it returned −0.2% with distributions reinvested, against −1.0% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Universal Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, APCB or GVI?
- In the year to Nov 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, APCB returned −1.3% and GVI −0.2%.
- Which is cheaper, APCB or GVI?
- GVI is cheaper, by 0.16 percentage points a year. That is about $16 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, APCB against GVI, data as of Nov 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/apcb-vs-gvi
ETFIQ. (Nov 12, 2026). APCB against GVI. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/apcb-vs-gvi
[APCB against GVI (ETFIQ, Nov 12, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/apcb-vs-gvi)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.
Net assets: $1.0bn on Aug 31, 2026 for ActivePassive Core Bond ETF, and $3.8bn on Nov 12, 2026 for iShares Intermediate Government/Credit Bond ETF.
APCB and GVI
Total return, distributions reinvested, 1 year.
APCB −1.3%, GVI −0.2%: GVI +1.1 pts ahead, 1 year, Nov 12, 2025 to Nov 12, 2026.