Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
AOR vs IBB: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, AOR returned +7.8% to IBB's +37.5%, and AOR charges 0.15% to IBB's 0.44%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about AOR and IBBNet assets: $3.9bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF, and $11.0bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Biotechnology ETF.
Pair scorecard
AOR costs 0.29 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 29.7 points; IBB is 2.8 times larger.
| Measure | AOR | IBB |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +7.8% | +37.5% |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | 60/40 Balanced Allocation | Biotech |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.44% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $3.9bn | $11.0bn |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 99% | |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 99.9% | 50% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, AOR and IBB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
AOR and IBB on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
AOR
AOR tracks an index of 60/40 Balanced Allocation. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +7.8% with distributions reinvested, against +13.4% for its benchmark, the MSCI All Country World Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 7 positions, with the top ten at 99.9%.
IBB
By weight, 40% of IBB's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 99%. The top ten holdings are 50% of the fund across 245 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned +37.5% with distributions reinvested.
Questions people ask
- Are AOR and IBB in the same category?
- AOR is an allocation ETF and IBB is a thematic ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
- Which returned more over the last year, AOR or IBB?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AOR returned +7.8% and IBB +37.5%.
- Which is cheaper, AOR or IBB?
- AOR is cheaper, by 0.29 percentage points a year. That is about $29 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, AOR against IBB, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/aor-vs-ibb
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). AOR against IBB. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/aor-vs-ibb
[AOR against IBB (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/aor-vs-ibb)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.