Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

AGG vs RSBT: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, AGG returned +0.2% to RSBT's +7.9%, and AGG charges 0.03% to RSBT's 1.01%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about AGG and RSBT

Net assets: $139.1bn on Nov 4, 2026 for iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF, and $135m on Jul 31, 2026 for Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF.

At a glance
+0.2%
AGG total return, 1 year
+7.9%
RSBT total return, 1 year
0.03%
AGG expense ratio
1.01%
RSBT expense ratio

Pair scorecard

AGG costs 0.98 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 7.7 points.

AGG vs RSBT: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureAGGRSBT
Return
Total return, 1 year+0.2%+7.9%
Total return, 52 weeks+8.0%
Against its benchmark
What it tracksBloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Indexnot published
Treasury bills, 52 weeks+3.7%
Against cash4.4 points ahead
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.03%1.01%
Net assets, AGG as of Nov 4, 2026 and RSBT as of Jul 31, 2026$139.1bn$135m
Holdings
Holdings in commonnot published
Risk
Correlation with the S&P 500’s weekly returns+0.52
Beta to the S&P 500+0.52: about 0.52% for each 1%
Its average week when the S&P 500 fellfell 0.80%
Down-week capture74.4%
Weeks the S&P 500 fell26 of 52, by 1.07% on average

Method

Side by side

AGG iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF RSBT Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Alternatives ETF
What it is Tracks an index of US aggregate bonds Managed futures
Total return, 1 year +0.2% +7.9%
Its benchmark over the same days +0.2% (SCHZ) not measured
Gap to its benchmark 0.0 pts vs SCHZ not measured
Expense ratio 0.03% 1.01%
Holdings 13462 not read by ETFIQ
Net assets, AGG as of Nov 4, 2026 and RSBT as of Jul 31, 2026 $139.1bn $135m

AGG and RSBT on the fields both publish, as of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

AGG flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
AGG

AGG tracks an index of US aggregate bonds. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 it returned +0.2% with distributions reinvested, against +0.2% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year.

RSBT

RSBT is a managed futures fund. ETFIQ measures what every alternatives fund is sold on: whether it moves differently from the stock market. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of +0.52 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of +0.52, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.52% the same way. The S&P 500 fell in 26 of those 52 weeks, by 1.07% on average. In the same weeks RSBT fell 0.80% on average, a down-week capture of 74.4%. Over the same 52 weeks RSBT returned +8.0% and a Treasury bill fund +3.7%, so it finished 4.4 percentage points ahead of cash.

Questions people ask

Are AGG and RSBT in the same category?
AGG is a bond ETF and RSBT is an alternatives ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
Which returned more over the last year, AGG or RSBT?
In the year to Nov 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AGG returned +0.2% and RSBT +7.9%.
Which is cheaper, AGG or RSBT?
AGG is cheaper, by 0.98 percentage points a year. That is about $98 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, AGG against RSBT, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/agg-vs-rsbt

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.