Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

AGG vs OVB: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, AGG returned −1.4% to OVB's +0.6%, and AGG charges 0.03% to OVB's 0.79%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about AGG and OVB

Net assets: $139.4bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF, and $47m on Aug 31, 2026 for Overlay Shares Core Bond ETF.

At a glance
−1.4%
AGG total return, 1 year
+0.6%
OVB total return, 1 year
0.03%
AGG expense ratio
0.79%
OVB expense ratio

Pair scorecard

AGG costs 0.76 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 2.0 points.

AGG vs OVB: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureAGGOVB
Return
Total return, 1 year−1.4%+0.6%
Price change, 1 yearfell 5.3%fell 5.8%
Latest payout, annualized6.2%
Return of capital, issuer estimate88% of the Oct 29, 2026 payment
Drawdown
Below its high3.4%, high on Aug 4, 2020
Benchmark
What it tracksBloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond IndexBenchmark: US investment grade bonds, measured through AGG
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.03%0.79%
Net assets, AGG as of Oct 27, 2026 and OVB as of Aug 31, 2026$139.4bn$47m
Holdings
Holdings in common0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Oct 11, 2019 to Oct 23, 2026 · 367 weekly returns
AGG OVB
Return
Total return edge OVB +4.6% +11.8%
Annualized edge OVB +0.6% +1.6%
Price return edge AGG −14.9% −21.1%
Risk
Volatility edge AGG 5.9% 7.1%
Max drawdown edge AGG −18.2% −21.4%
Downside capture 97.5% 107.0%
Beta 0.94 1.08
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge OVB −0.35 −0.15
Sortino edge OVB −0.48 −0.21
Treynor 0.004 −0.010
Calmar edge OVB 0.04 0.07
Against the benchmark
Alpha +0.1% a year +1.2% a year
Alpha t-stat 0.23 1.01
Information ratio 0.04 0.32
Tracking error 1.1% 3.1%

Each against its own benchmark: AGG against SCHZ, Jul 22, 2011 to Oct 23, 2026; OVB against AGG, Oct 11, 2019 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

OVB returned more: +11.8% to +4.6%. AGG swung less: 5.9% to 7.1%. AGG fell less at its worst: −18.2% to −21.4%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: AGG vs OVB: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureAGGOVBEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+4.6%+11.8%OVBPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+0.6%+1.6%OVBTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return−14.9%−21.1%AGGPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility5.9%7.1%AGGSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation4.3%5.1%AGGLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−18.2%−21.4%AGGDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture97.5%115.9%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture97.5%107.0%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta0.941.08Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.950.81Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe−0.35−0.15OVBReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino−0.48−0.21OVBReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.004−0.010Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.040.07OVBAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkSCHZAGGThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+0.1% a year+1.2% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat0.231.01Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−0.4% to +0.6%−1.1% to +3.5%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.040.32Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error1.1%3.1%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 367 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, AGG and OVB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first AGG OVB
Only in one fund ↓
Only in AGG
BLACKROCK CASH CL INST SL AGENCY 3.02%
TREASURY NOTE 0.40%
TREASURY NOTE (OLD) 0.40%
TREASURY NOTE 0.40%
TREASURY NOTE 0.40%
TREASURY NOTE 0.39%
TREASURY NOTE 0.39%
TREASURY NOTE 0.38%
Only in OVB
iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bo 100.05%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

AGG iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF OVB Overlay Shares Core Bond ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Income ETF
What it is Tracks an index of US aggregate bonds put-selling overlay, vs AGG
Total return, 1 year −1.4% +0.6%
Its benchmark over the same days −1.3% (SCHZ) −1.4% (AGG)
Gap to its benchmark −0.1 pts vs SCHZ +2.0 pts vs AGG
Cash paid, 1 year not an income fund 6.3%
Expense ratio 0.03% 0.79%
Holdings 13469 not read by ETFIQ
Net assets, AGG as of Oct 27, 2026 and OVB as of Aug 31, 2026 $139.4bn $47m

AGG and OVB on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-BB5064F8EC

AGG and OVB do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. AGG follows Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index and OVB is measured against US investment grade bonds through AGG.
  2. Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 AGG returned −1.4% and OVB +0.6% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 2.0 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

AGG flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
AGG

AGG tracks an index of US aggregate bonds. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −1.4% with distributions reinvested, against −1.3% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. It sat 3.4% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Oct 28, 2026.

OVB

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, OVB paid 6.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 5.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +0.6%. US investment grade bonds (AGG) returned −1.4% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 2.0 pts. At its price on Oct 28, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.2%, paid monthly. Overlay Shares estimates that 88% of the distribution paid Oct 29, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

Questions people ask

Are AGG and OVB in the same category?
AGG is a bond ETF and OVB is an option-income ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
Which returned more over the last year, AGG or OVB?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AGG returned −1.4% and OVB +0.6%.
Which is cheaper, AGG or OVB?
AGG is cheaper, by 0.76 percentage points a year. That is about $76 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, AGG against OVB, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/agg-vs-ovb

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.