Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

AGG vs KMLM: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, AGG returned +0.2% to KMLM's +16.5%, and AGG charges 0.03% to KMLM's 0.90%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about AGG and KMLM

Net assets on Nov 4, 2026: $139.1bn for iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF and $586m for KraneShares Mount Lucas Managed Futures Index Strategy ETF.

At a glance
+0.2%
AGG total return, 1 year
+16.5%
KMLM total return, 1 year
0.03%
AGG expense ratio
0.90%
KMLM expense ratio

Pair scorecard

AGG costs 0.87 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 16.3 points; AGG is far larger, $139.1bn against $586m.

AGG vs KMLM: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureAGGKMLM
Return
Total return, 1 year+0.2%+16.5%
Total return, 52 weeks+16.6%
Against its benchmark
What it tracksBloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Indexnot published
Treasury bills, 52 weeks+3.7%
Against cash12.9 points ahead
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.03%0.90%
Net assets$139.1bn$586m
Holdings
Holdings in commonnot published
Risk
Correlation with the S&P 500’s weekly returns−0.12
Beta to the S&P 500−0.12: about 0.12% for each 1%
Its average week when the S&P 500 fellrose 0.18%
Down-week capture−16.3%
Weeks the S&P 500 fell26 of 52, by 1.07% on average

Method

Side by side

AGG iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF KMLM KraneShares Mount Lucas Managed Futures Index Strategy ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Alternatives ETF
What it is Tracks an index of US aggregate bonds Managed futures
Total return, 1 year +0.2% +16.5%
Its benchmark over the same days +0.2% (SCHZ) not measured
Gap to its benchmark 0.0 pts vs SCHZ not measured
Expense ratio 0.03% 0.90%
Holdings 13462 not read by ETFIQ
Net assets $139.1bn $586m

AGG and KMLM on the fields both publish, as of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

AGG and KMLM flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
AGG

AGG tracks an index of US aggregate bonds. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 it returned +0.2% with distributions reinvested, against +0.2% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year.

KMLM

KMLM is a managed futures fund. ETFIQ measures what every alternatives fund is sold on: whether it moves differently from the stock market. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of −0.12 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of −0.12, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.12% the other way. The S&P 500 fell in 26 of those 52 weeks, by 1.07% on average. In the same weeks KMLM rose 0.18% on average, a down-week capture of −16.3%. Over the same 52 weeks KMLM returned +16.6% and a Treasury bill fund +3.7%, so it finished 12.9 percentage points ahead of cash.

Questions people ask

Are AGG and KMLM in the same category?
AGG is a bond ETF and KMLM is an alternatives ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
Which returned more over the last year, AGG or KMLM?
In the year to Nov 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AGG returned +0.2% and KMLM +16.5%.
Which is cheaper, AGG or KMLM?
AGG is cheaper, by 0.87 percentage points a year. That is about $87 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, AGG against KMLM, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/agg-vs-kmlm

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.