Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
AGG vs GLD: how they differ
AGG is a bond index fund and GLD a commodity fund, and over the year GLD returned more, +19.1% against −0.7%.
iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF and SPDR Gold Shares.
| AGG iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | GLD SPDR Gold Shares | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | State Street |
| What it is | US aggregate bonds | Gold |
| Total return, 1 year | −0.7% | +19.1% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −18.2 pts | +1.6 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.03% | 0.40% |
AGG in plain words
AGG is a bond fund tracking the US aggregate bonds. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −0.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. It sat 3.7% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Sep 11, 2026.
GLD in plain words
GLD is a commodity fund tracking the Gold. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +19.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.40% a year. It sat 19.6% below its high of Jan 29, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, AGG or GLD?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AGG returned −0.7% and GLD returned +19.1%, so GLD returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, AGG or GLD?
- AGG charges 0.03% a year and GLD charges 0.40%, so AGG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, AGG against GLD, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/agg-vs-gld Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources