Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

AGG vs FFLS: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, AGG returned +0.2% to FFLS's −0.1%, and AGG charges 0.03% to FFLS's 1.24%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about AGG and FFLS

Net assets: $139.1bn on Nov 4, 2026 for iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF, and $43m on Aug 31, 2026 for The Future Fund Long/Short ETF.

At a glance
+0.2%
AGG total return, 1 year
−0.1%
FFLS total return, 1 year
0.03%
AGG expense ratio
1.24%
FFLS expense ratio

Pair scorecard

AGG costs 1.21 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.3 points.

AGG vs FFLS: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureAGGFFLS
Return
Total return, 1 year+0.2%−0.1%
Total return, 52 weeks+1.3%
Against its benchmark
What it tracksBloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Indexnot published
Treasury bills, 52 weeks+3.7%
Against cash2.4 points behind
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.03%1.24%
Net assets, AGG as of Nov 4, 2026 and FFLS as of Aug 31, 2026$139.1bn$43m
Holdings
Holdings in commonnot published
Risk
Correlation with the S&P 500’s weekly returns+0.65
Beta to the S&P 500+0.61: about 0.61% for each 1%
Its average week when the S&P 500 fellfell 0.70%
Down-week capture65.7%
Weeks the S&P 500 fell26 of 52, by 1.07% on average

Method

Side by side

AGG iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF FFLS The Future Fund Long/Short ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Alternatives ETF
What it is Tracks an index of US aggregate bonds Long-short equity
Total return, 1 year +0.2% −0.1%
Its benchmark over the same days +0.2% (SCHZ) not measured
Gap to its benchmark 0.0 pts vs SCHZ not measured
Expense ratio 0.03% 1.24%
Holdings 13462 not read by ETFIQ
Net assets, AGG as of Nov 4, 2026 and FFLS as of Aug 31, 2026 $139.1bn $43m

AGG and FFLS on the fields both publish, as of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

AGG flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
AGG

AGG tracks an index of US aggregate bonds. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 it returned +0.2% with distributions reinvested, against +0.2% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year.

FFLS

FFLS is a long-short equity fund. ETFIQ measures what every alternatives fund is sold on: whether it moves differently from the stock market. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of +0.65 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of +0.61, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.61% the same way. The S&P 500 fell in 26 of those 52 weeks, by 1.07% on average. In the same weeks FFLS fell 0.70% on average, a down-week capture of 65.7%. Over the same 52 weeks FFLS returned +1.3% and a Treasury bill fund +3.7%, so it finished 2.4 percentage points behind cash.

Questions people ask

Are AGG and FFLS in the same category?
AGG is a bond ETF and FFLS is an alternatives ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
Which returned more over the last year, AGG or FFLS?
In the year to Nov 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AGG returned +0.2% and FFLS −0.1%.
Which is cheaper, AGG or FFLS?
AGG is cheaper, by 1.21 percentage points a year. That is about $121 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, AGG against FFLS, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/agg-vs-ffls

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.