Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

AGG vs BTAL: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, AGG returned +0.2% to BTAL's −11.5%, and AGG charges 0.03% to BTAL's 1.25%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about AGG and BTAL

Net assets: $139.1bn on Nov 4, 2026 for iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF, and $283m on Jun 30, 2026 for AGF U.S. Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund.

At a glance
+0.2%
AGG total return, 1 year
−11.5%
BTAL total return, 1 year
0.03%
AGG expense ratio
1.25%
BTAL expense ratio

Pair scorecard

AGG costs 1.22 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 11.7 points.

AGG vs BTAL: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureAGGBTAL
Return
Total return, 1 year+0.2%−11.5%
Total return, 52 weeks−10.0%
Against its benchmark
What it tracksBloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Indexnot published
Treasury bills, 52 weeks+3.7%
Against cash13.7 points behind
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.03%1.25%
Net assets, AGG as of Nov 4, 2026 and BTAL as of Jun 30, 2026$139.1bn$283m
Holdings
Holdings in commonnot published
Risk
Correlation with the S&P 500’s weekly returns−0.74
Beta to the S&P 500−1.37: about 1.37% for each 1%
Its average week when the S&P 500 fellrose 1.80%
Down-week capture−168.4%
Weeks the S&P 500 fell26 of 52, by 1.07% on average

Method

Side by side

AGG iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF BTAL AGF U.S. Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund
Where it sits Bond ETF Alternatives ETF
Issuer iShares AGF Investments
What it is Tracks an index of US aggregate bonds Market neutral
Total return, 1 year +0.2% −11.5%
Its benchmark over the same days +0.2% (SCHZ) +14.8% (VOO)
Gap to its benchmark 0.0 pts vs SCHZ −26.3 pts vs VOO
Expense ratio 0.03% 1.25%
Holdings 13462 not read by ETFIQ
Net assets, AGG as of Nov 4, 2026 and BTAL as of Jun 30, 2026 $139.1bn $283m

AGG and BTAL on the fields both publish, as of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

AGG flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
AGG

AGG tracks an index of US aggregate bonds. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 it returned +0.2% with distributions reinvested, against +0.2% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year.

BTAL

BTAL is a market neutral fund. ETFIQ measures what every alternatives fund is sold on: whether it moves differently from the stock market. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of −0.74 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of −1.37, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 1.37% the other way. The S&P 500 fell in 26 of those 52 weeks, by 1.07% on average. In the same weeks BTAL rose 1.80% on average, a down-week capture of −168.4%. Over the same 52 weeks BTAL returned −10.0% and a Treasury bill fund +3.7%, so it finished 13.7 percentage points behind cash.

Questions people ask

Are AGG and BTAL in the same category?
AGG is a bond ETF and BTAL is an alternatives ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
Which returned more over the last year, AGG or BTAL?
In the year to Nov 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AGG returned +0.2% and BTAL −11.5%.
Which is cheaper, AGG or BTAL?
AGG is cheaper, by 1.22 percentage points a year. That is about $122 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, AGG against BTAL, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/agg-vs-btal

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.