Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

AGG vs BND: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

AGG's duration was 5.8 years on Aug 31, 2026 and BND's 5.7 on Jun 30, 2026; both charge 0.03%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about AGG and BND

Net assets: $139.4bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF, and $161.4bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF.

At a glance
−1.4%
AGG total return, 1 year
−1.3%
BND total return, 1 year
0.03%
AGG expense ratio
0.03%
BND expense ratio

Pair scorecard

Both cost 0.03% a year; their one-year returns differ by 0.1 points; BND is 1.2 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

AGG vs BND: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureAGGBND
Return
Total return, 1 year−1.4%−1.3%
Drawdown
Below its high3.4%, high on Aug 4, 20203.5%, high on Aug 6, 2020
Benchmark
What it tracksBloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond IndexBloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.03%0.03%
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026$135.7bn$161.4bn
Holdings
Holdings in common65%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Apr 20, 2007 to Oct 23, 2026 · 1,018 weekly returns
AGG BND
Return
Total return edge BND (slight) +73.7% +75.5%
Annualized edge Tie +2.9% +2.9%
Price return edge AGG −4.2% −5.4%
Risk
Volatility edge BND (slight) 5.4% 5.0%
Max drawdown edge Tie −18.2% −18.4%
Downside capture 97.5% 95.6%
Beta 0.94 0.91
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge BND (slight) 0.26 0.29
Sortino edge BND 0.35 0.39
Treynor 0.004 0.016
Calmar edge Tie 0.16 0.16
Against the benchmark
Alpha +0.1% a year +0.2% a year
Alpha t-stat 0.23 0.59
Information ratio 0.04 0.03
Tracking error 1.1% 1.3%

Each against its own benchmark: AGG against SCHZ, Jul 22, 2011 to Oct 23, 2026; BND against AGG, Apr 20, 2007 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

BND returned slightly more: +75.5% to +73.7%. BND swung slightly less: 5.0% to 5.4%. AGG and BND fell about the same at their worst: −18.2% and −18.4%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: AGG vs BND: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureAGGBNDEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+73.7%+75.5%BND (slight)Price change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+2.9%+2.9%TieTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return−4.2%−5.4%AGGPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility5.4%5.0%BND (slight)Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation4.0%3.7%BND (slight)Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−18.2%−18.4%TieDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture97.5%95.8%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture97.5%95.6%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta0.940.91Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.950.94Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.260.29BND (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.350.39BNDReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.0040.016Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.160.16TieAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkSCHZAGGThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+0.1% a year+0.2% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat0.230.59Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−0.4% to +0.6%−0.4% to +0.7%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.040.03Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error1.1%1.3%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 1,018 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

65%

By the books each fund has filed, AGG and BND hold 65% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

65% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first AGG BND
U.S. Treasury Notes, due Feb 15, 2035 0.41% 0.41%
U.S. Treasury Notes, due Nov 15, 2034 0.40% 0.41%
U.S. Treasury Notes, due May 15, 2034 0.40% 0.41%
U.S. Treasury Notes, due Aug 15, 2034 0.39% 0.41%
U.S. Treasury Notes, due Feb 15, 2036 0.39% 0.41%
U.S. Treasury Notes, due Nov 15, 2033 0.38% 0.39%
U.S. Treasury Notes, due Aug 15, 2035 0.38% 0.39%
U.S. Treasury Notes, due Feb 15, 2034 0.37% 0.40%
U.S. Treasury Notes, due May 15, 2035 0.39% 0.36%
U.S. Treasury Notes, due Feb 28, 2030 0.40% 0.34%
U.S. Treasury Notes, due Aug 15, 2033 0.34% 0.36%
U.S. Treasury Notes, due May 15, 2032 0.32% 0.35%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in AGG
Ginnie Mae, due Sep 1, 2056 0.20%
Uniform Mortgage-Backed Security, TBA, due Sep 1, 2056 0.17%
Ginnie Mae, due Sep 1, 2056 0.16%
Uniform Mortgage-Backed Security, TBA, due Sep 1, 2041 0.15%
Uniform Mortgage-Backed Security, TBA, due Sep 1, 2056 0.15%
Ginnie Mae, due Sep 1, 2056 0.15%
U.S. Treasury Notes, due Jan 15, 2029 0.14%
Uniform Mortgage-Backed Security, TBA, due Sep 1, 2056 0.13%
Only in BND
US TREASURY N/B, due Jul 31, 2027 0.22%
US TREASURY N/B, due Jul 31, 2027 0.21%
US TREASURY N/B, due Jun 30, 2027 0.19%
US TREASURY N/B, due Jul 31, 2027 0.18%
US TREASURY N/B, due Jun 15, 2027 0.16%
US TREASURY N/B, due Jul 15, 2027 0.16%
US TREASURY N/B, due Jun 30, 2027 0.15%
US TREASURY N/B, due Jun 30, 2027 0.12%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

AGG iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Bond ETF
What it is Tracks an index of US aggregate bonds Tracks an index of US aggregate bonds
Total return, 1 year −1.4% −1.3%
Its benchmark over the same days −1.3% (SCHZ) −1.4% (AGG)
Gap to its benchmark −0.1 pts vs SCHZ +0.1 pts vs AGG
Expense ratio 0.03% 0.03%
Holdings 13469 16301
Net assets, AGG as of Oct 27, 2026 and BND as of Sep 30, 2026 $139.4bn $161.4bn

AGG and BND on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-E270395749

AGG and BND are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. What each follows. AGG follows Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index and BND follows Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index.
  2. Holdings in common (similar). 65% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026).
  3. One-year total return (similar). Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 AGG returned −1.4% and BND −1.3% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 0.1 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

AGG flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
AGG

AGG tracks an index of US aggregate bonds. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −1.4% with distributions reinvested, against −1.3% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. It sat 3.4% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Oct 28, 2026.

BND

BND tracks an index of US aggregate bonds. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −1.3% with distributions reinvested, against −1.4% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index, measured by the closely related Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. It sat 3.5% below its high of Aug 6, 2020 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, AGG or BND?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AGG returned −1.4% and BND −1.3%.
Which is cheaper, AGG or BND?
Neither: AGG and BND both charge 0.03% a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, AGG against BND, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/agg-vs-bnd

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.