Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
AGG vs BND: Differences, Returns & Fees
AGG's duration was 5.8 years on Aug 31, 2026 and BND's 5.7 on Jun 30, 2026; both charge 0.03%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about AGG and BNDNet assets: $139.4bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF, and $161.4bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF.
Pair scorecard
Both cost 0.03% a year; their one-year returns differ by 0.1 points; BND is 1.2 times larger.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | AGG | BND |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | −1.4% | −1.3% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 3.4%, high on Aug 4, 2020 | 3.5%, high on Aug 6, 2020 |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index | Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.03% | 0.03% |
| Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026 | $135.7bn | $161.4bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 65% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Apr 20, 2007 to Oct 23, 2026 · 1,018 weekly returnsEach against its own benchmark: AGG against SCHZ, Jul 22, 2011 to Oct 23, 2026; BND against AGG, Apr 20, 2007 to Oct 23, 2026.
BND returned slightly more: +75.5% to +73.7%. BND swung slightly less: 5.0% to 5.4%. AGG and BND fell about the same at their worst: −18.2% and −18.4%.
Full scorecard
19 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | AGG | BND | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +73.7% | +75.5% | BND (slight) | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +2.9% | +2.9% | Tie | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | −4.2% | −5.4% | AGG | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 5.4% | 5.0% | BND (slight) | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 4.0% | 3.7% | BND (slight) | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −18.2% | −18.4% | Tie | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Upside capture | 97.5% | 95.8% | Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose. | |
| Downside capture | 97.5% | 95.6% | Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better. | |
| Beta | 0.94 | 0.91 | Not an edge | How far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves. |
| R squared | 0.95 | 0.94 | Not an edge | Share of its weekly moves its benchmark explains. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.26 | 0.29 | BND (slight) | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 0.35 | 0.39 | BND | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Treynor | 0.004 | 0.016 | Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta. | |
| Calmar | 0.16 | 0.16 | Tie | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
| Against the benchmark | ||||
| Benchmark | SCHZ | AGG | The ETF each fund is measured against. | |
| Alpha | +0.1% a year | +0.2% a year | Not significant | Yearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts. |
| Alpha t-stat | 0.23 | 0.59 | Not an edge | How sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance. |
| Alpha range | −0.4% to +0.6% | −0.4% to +0.7% | Includes zero | The 95% range for the yearly alpha. |
| Information ratio | 0.04 | 0.03 | Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error. | |
| Tracking error | 1.1% | 1.3% | Not an edge | How far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 1,018 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, AGG and BND hold 65% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026.
half
65% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
AGG and BND on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
AGG and BND are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. AGG follows Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index and BND follows Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index.
- Holdings in common (similar). 65% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026).
- One-year total return (similar). Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 AGG returned −1.4% and BND −1.3% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 0.1 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
AGG
AGG tracks an index of US aggregate bonds. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −1.4% with distributions reinvested, against −1.3% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. It sat 3.4% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Oct 28, 2026.
BND
BND tracks an index of US aggregate bonds. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −1.3% with distributions reinvested, against −1.4% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index, measured by the closely related Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. It sat 3.5% below its high of Aug 6, 2020 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, AGG against BND, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/agg-vs-bnd
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). AGG against BND. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/agg-vs-bnd
[AGG against BND (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/agg-vs-bnd)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.