Which returned more over the last year, ACWX or JNK?

In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ACWX returned +23.0% and JNK returned +3.3%, so ACWX returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, ACWX or JNK?

ACWX charges 0.32% a year and JNK charges 0.40%, so ACWX is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

ACWX vs JNK: how they differ

ACWX and JNK hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and ACWX returned more over the year.

iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF and State Street(R) SPDR(R) Bloomberg High Yield Bond ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ACWX and JNK hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in ACWX	Only in JNK
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING 5.09%	1261229 BC LTD 0.64%
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS LTD 2.50%	MERIDIAN ARC HOLDCO LLC 0.58%
SK HYNIX 2.04%	ECHOSTAR CORP 0.52%
ASML HOLDING 1.77%	PR RNO PROPERTY OWNER 1 0.49%
HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 0.94%	CLOUD SOFTWARE GRP INC 0.42%
TENCENT HOLDINGS 0.88%	QUIKRETE HOLDINGS INC 0.41%
ROCHE PS PAR AG 0.79%	DISH NETWORK CORP 0.41%
ROYAL BANK OF CANADA 0.76%	SV RNO PROPERTY OWNER 1 0.40%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 10, 2026.

ACWX and JNK on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	ACWX iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF	JNK State Street(R) SPDR(R) Bloomberg High Yield Bond ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	State Street
What it is	MSCI ACWI ex U.S.	SPDR Bloomberg High Yield Bond
Total return, 1 year	+23.0%	+3.3%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	+5.5 pts	−14.2 pts
Expense ratio	0.32%	0.40%
Holdings	1515	1198

ACWX in plain words

ACWX is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI ACWI ex U.S.. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +23.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.32% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1515 positions, with the top ten at 16.1%.

JNK in plain words

JNK is a bond fund tracking the SPDR Bloomberg High Yield Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +3.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.40% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ACWX or JNK?: In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ACWX returned +23.0% and JNK returned +3.3%, so ACWX returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, ACWX or JNK?: ACWX charges 0.32% a year and JNK charges 0.40%, so ACWX is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ACWX against JNK, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACWX against JNK, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/acwx-vs-jnk Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources