Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
ACWX vs IJT: how they differ
ACWX and IJT hold 1% of their weight in the same names, and ACWX returned more over the year.
iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF and iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, ACWX and IJT hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | ACWX | IJT |
|---|---|---|
| AIRBUS GROUP | 0.36% | 0.58% |
| LVMH | 0.31% | 0.26% |
| BLK CSH FND TREASURY SL AGENCY | 0.11% | 0.76% |
| CREDIT AGRICOLE SA | 0.06% | 0.54% |
| FINECOBANK BANCA FINECO | 0.04% | 0.12% |
| CONTINENTAL AG | 0.02% | 0.24% |
| OUTSURANCE GROUP | 0.01% | 0.35% |
| Only in ACWX | Only in IJT |
|---|---|
| TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING 5.09% | CORCEPT THERAPEUTICS 1.29% |
| SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS LTD 2.50% | VIASAT INC 1.19% |
| SK HYNIX 2.04% | BRINKER INTERNATIONAL INC 1.09% |
| ASML HOLDING 1.77% | PROTAGONIST THERAPEUTICS 1.03% |
| HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 0.94% | FORMFACTOR INC 1.03% |
| TENCENT HOLDINGS 0.88% | RYMAN HOSPITALITY PROPERTIES REIT 0.98% |
| ROCHE PS PAR AG 0.79% | ALKERMES 0.91% |
| ROYAL BANK OF CANADA 0.76% | STONEX GROUP INC 0.87% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.
| ACWX iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF | IJT iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | iShares |
| What it is | MSCI ACWI ex U.S. | S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth |
| Total return, 1 year | +23.0% | +17.6% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +5.5 pts | +0.1 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.32% | 0.18% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Holdings | 1515 | 355 |
ACWX in plain words
ACWX is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI ACWI ex U.S.. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +23.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.32% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1515 positions, with the top ten at 16.1%.
IJT in plain words
IJT is an index equity fund tracking the S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 355 positions, with the top ten at 10.1%. It sat 7.0% below its high of Aug 4, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, ACWX or IJT?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ACWX returned +23.0% and IJT returned +17.6%, so ACWX returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, ACWX or IJT?
- ACWX charges 0.32% a year and IJT charges 0.18%, so IJT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do ACWX and IJT overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 0% of ACWX and 0% of IJT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 1% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACWX against IJT, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/acwx-vs-ijt Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources