Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
IJT vs IXUS: how they differ
IJT and IXUS hold 1% of their weight in the same names, and IXUS returned more over the year.
iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF and iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, IJT and IXUS hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | IJT | IXUS |
|---|---|---|
| AAR | 0.58% | 0.32% |
| MOELIS CLASS A | 0.26% | 0.28% |
| BLK CSH FND TREASURY SL AGENCY | 0.76% | 0.09% |
| ARCOSA | 0.54% | 0.05% |
| FB FINANCIAL | 0.12% | 0.04% |
| CONCENTRA GROUP HOLDINGS PARENT IN | 0.24% | 0.02% |
| ARTISAN PARTNERS ASSET MANAGEMENT | 0.18% | 0.01% |
| EPLUS | 0.17% | 0.01% |
| HORACE MANN EDUCATORS CORP | 0.12% | 0.01% |
| MERCURY GENERAL | 0.32% | 0.01% |
| MILLROSE PROPERTIES INC CLASS A | 0.32% | 0.01% |
| NATIONAL HEALTHCARE CORP | 0.33% | 0.01% |
| Only in IJT | Only in IXUS |
|---|---|
| CORCEPT THERAPEUTICS 1.29% | TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING 4.49% |
| VIASAT INC 1.19% | SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS LTD 2.21% |
| BRINKER INTERNATIONAL INC 1.09% | SK HYNIX 1.79% |
| PROTAGONIST THERAPEUTICS 1.03% | ASML HOLDING 1.55% |
| FORMFACTOR INC 1.03% | HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 0.84% |
| RYMAN HOSPITALITY PROPERTIES REIT 0.98% | TENCENT HOLDINGS 0.78% |
| ALKERMES 0.91% | ROCHE PS PAR AG 0.70% |
| STONEX GROUP INC 0.87% | ROYAL BANK OF CANADA 0.68% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.
| IJT iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF | IXUS iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | iShares |
| What it is | S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth | Core MSCI Total International Stock |
| Total return, 1 year | +17.6% | +22.2% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +0.1 pts | +4.7 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.18% | 0.07% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Holdings | 355 | 2540 |
IJT in plain words
IJT is an index equity fund tracking the S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 355 positions, with the top ten at 10.1%. It sat 7.0% below its high of Aug 4, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
IXUS in plain words
IXUS is an index equity fund tracking the Core MSCI Total International Stock. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +22.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2540 positions, with the top ten at 14.3%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IJT or IXUS?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IJT returned +17.6% and IXUS returned +22.2%, so IXUS returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, IJT or IXUS?
- IJT charges 0.18% a year and IXUS charges 0.07%, so IXUS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do IJT and IXUS overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IJT and 0% of IXUS by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 1% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, IJT against IXUS, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ijt-vs-ixus Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources