Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

ACWI vs IJS: how they differ

ACWI and IJS hold 1% of their weight in the same names, and IJS returned more over the year.

iShares MSCI ACWI ETF and iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ACWI and IJS hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions ACWI and IJS both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingACWIIJS
SIEMENS ENERGY N AG0.12%0.14%
LVMH0.11%0.22%
BLK CSH FND TREASURY SL AGENCY0.10%1.68%
CANADIAN NATIONAL RAILWAY0.06%0.55%
UCB SA0.03%0.45%
CREDIT AGRICOLE SA0.02%0.28%
MTU AERO ENGINES HOLDING AG0.02%0.24%
TERNA RETE ELETTRICA NAZIONALE0.02%0.25%
ABSA GROUP0.01%0.43%
CONTINENTAL AG0.01%0.23%
FINECOBANK BANCA FINECO0.01%0.14%
SIGMA HEALTHCARE0.01%0.43%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in ACWIOnly in IJS
NVIDIA 4.89%MATCH GROUP INC 1.08%
APPLE 4.67%PAYCOM SOFTWARE 0.99%
MICROSOFT 3.38%SM ENERGY 0.96%
AMAZON.COM INC 2.38%CARMAX INC 0.95%
ALPHABET CLASS A 1.90%EASTMAN CHEMICAL 0.86%
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING 1.86%JACKSON FINANCIAL CLASS A 0.81%
BROADCOM INC 1.59%LINCOLN NATIONAL CORP 0.79%
ALPHABET CLASS C 1.50%CONAGRA BRANDS 0.78%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.

ACWI and IJS on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF
IJS
iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesiShares
What it isMSCI ACWIS&P Small-Cap 600 Value
Total return, 1 year+19.1%+22.1%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+1.6 pts+4.7 pts
Expense ratio0.32%0.18%
Already in the S&P 50061.4%0.0%
Holdings1630466

ACWI in plain words

ACWI is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI ACWI. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +19.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.32% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 61% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1630 positions, with the top ten at 24.6%.

IJS in plain words

IJS is an index equity fund tracking the S&P Small-Cap 600 Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +22.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 466 positions, with the top ten at 9.7%. It sat 4.3% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ACWI or IJS?
In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ACWI returned +19.1% and IJS returned +22.1%, so IJS returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, ACWI or IJS?
ACWI charges 0.32% a year and IJS charges 0.18%, so IJS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do ACWI and IJS overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 61% of ACWI and 0% of IJS by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 1% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ACWI against IJS, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACWI against IJS, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/acwi-vs-ijs Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources