Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
ACWI vs IBB: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, ACWI returned +13.4% to IBB's +37.5%, and ACWI charges 0.32% to IBB's 0.44%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about ACWI and IBBNet assets: $33.0bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares MSCI ACWI ETF, and $11.0bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Biotechnology ETF.
Pair scorecard
ACWI costs 0.12 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 24.1 points; ACWI is 3.0 times larger.
| Measure | ACWI | IBB |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +13.4% | +37.5% |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | MSCI ACWI | Biotech |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.32% | 0.44% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 26, 2026 | $32.6bn | $10.7bn |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 99% | |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 1% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 24.9% | 50% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Apr 4, 2008 to Oct 23, 2026 · 968 weekly returnsIBB returned more: +726.3% to +333.1%. ACWI swung less: 18.5% to 23.2%. IBB fell less at its worst: −37.5% to −55.3%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | ACWI | IBB | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +333.1% | +726.3% | IBB | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +8.2% | +12.0% | IBB | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +204.7% | +691.9% | IBB | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 18.5% | 23.2% | ACWI | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 13.2% | 16.1% | ACWI | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −55.3% | −37.5% | IBB | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.44 | 0.54 | IBB | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 0.62 | 0.78 | IBB | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | 0.15 | 0.32 | IBB | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 968 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, ACWI and IBB hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.
half
1% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
ACWI and IBB on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ACWI and IBB do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?
- What each follows. ACWI follows MSCI ACWI and IBB follows Biotech.
- Holdings in common. 1% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 ACWI returned +13.4% and IBB +37.5% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 24.1 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
ACWI
ACWI tracks the MSCI ACWI. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.32% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 61% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2,197 positions, with the top ten at 24.9%.
IBB
By weight, 40% of IBB's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 99%. The top ten holdings are 50% of the fund across 245 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned +37.5% with distributions reinvested.
Questions people ask
- Are ACWI and IBB in the same category?
- ACWI is a stock ETF and IBB is a thematic ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
- Which returned more over the last year, ACWI or IBB?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ACWI returned +13.4% and IBB +37.5%.
- Which is cheaper, ACWI or IBB?
- ACWI is cheaper, by 0.12 percentage points a year. That is about $12 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, ACWI against IBB, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/acwi-vs-ibb
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). ACWI against IBB. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/acwi-vs-ibb
[ACWI against IBB (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/acwi-vs-ibb)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.