Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
ACWI vs BITO: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, ACWI returned +13.4% to BITO's −30.5%, and ACWI charges 0.32% to BITO's 0.95%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about ACWI and BITO
Net assets on Oct 28, 2026: $33.0bn for iShares MSCI ACWI ETF and $1.6bn for ProShares Bitcoin ETF.
Pair scorecard
ACWI costs 0.63 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 43.9 points; ACWI is far larger, $33.0bn against $1.6bn.
| Measure | ACWI | BITO |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +13.4% | −30.5% |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | MSCI ACWI | Bitcoin futures and swaps on Bitcoin |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.32% | 0.95% |
| Net assets | $33.0bn | $1.6bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 61% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 24.9% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, ACWI and BITO hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
ACWI and BITO on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ACWI
ACWI tracks the MSCI ACWI. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.32% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 61% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2,197 positions, with the top ten at 24.9%.
BITO is a registered fund that reaches Bitcoin through what its N-PORT for Aug 31, 2026 lists: Bitcoin futures and swaps on Bitcoin. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, Bitcoin moved −28.3% and BITO returned −30.5%. That leaves it 2.2 percentage points behind. BITO is a registered investment company: it files a monthly N-PORT rather than a 10-K. Its N-PORT for Aug 31, 2026 puts 67.9% of its net assets in ProShares GENIUS Money Market ETF.
A holder gets exposure to Bitcoin without the fund holding the coin itself. That difference is the fee, the cost of rolling the futures from one month to the next, what the futures traded at against Bitcoin, and what the market paid for the shares, all of it together. It is the only number on this page the sponsor does not publish itself.
Questions people ask
- Are ACWI and BITO in the same category?
- ACWI is a stock ETF and BITO is a crypto futures ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
- Which returned more over the last year, ACWI or BITO?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ACWI returned +13.4% and BITO −30.5%.
- Which is cheaper, ACWI or BITO?
- ACWI is cheaper, by 0.63 percentage points a year. That is about $63 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, ACWI against BITO, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/acwi-vs-bito
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). ACWI against BITO. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/acwi-vs-bito
[ACWI against BITO (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/acwi-vs-bito)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.