Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
ACBH vs IVV: Differences, Returns & Fees
ACBH and IVV are measured over different days, and IVV charges 0.03% to ACBH's 0.60%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about ACBH and IVV
Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $3.8m for Pacer Metaurus High Income Autocallable ETF and $885.1bn for iShares Core S&P 500 ETF.
Pair scorecard
IVV costs 0.57 points a year less; IVV is far larger, $885.1bn against $3.8m.
| Measure | ACBH | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | not published | +13.7% |
| Cash paid, share of starting value, since Sep 10, 2026 | 0.8% | |
| Price change, since Sep 10, 2026 | rose 2.3% | |
| Latest payout, annualized | 9.9% | |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Benchmark: S&P 500, measured through SPY | S&P 500 |
| Against its benchmark, same days | ahead by 0.9 pts | |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.60% | 0.03% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $3.8m | $885.1bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | not published | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 100% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 38.1% | |
Side by side
ACBH and IVV on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
No client brief for this pair: ETFIQ prints no one-year total return for ACBH.
ACBH
Over the period from its first trade on Sep 10, 2026 to Oct 28, 2026, ACBH paid 0.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 2.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +3.1%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +2.2% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 0.9 pts. At its price on Oct 28, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 9.9%, paid periodically.
IVV
IVV tracks the S&P 500. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.7% with distributions reinvested, against +13.6% for its benchmark, the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 505 positions, with the top ten at 38.1%.
Questions people ask
- Are ACBH and IVV in the same category?
- ACBH is an option-income ETF and IVV is a stock ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
- Which is cheaper, ACBH or IVV?
- IVV is cheaper, by 0.57 percentage points a year. That is about $57 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, ACBH against IVV, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/acbh-vs-ivv
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). ACBH against IVV. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/acbh-vs-ivv
[ACBH against IVV (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/acbh-vs-ivv)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.