IQ

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

ACBE vs IVV: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

ACBE and IVV are measured over different days, and IVV charges 0.03% to ACBE's 0.60%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about ACBE and IVV

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $3.8m for Pacer Metaurus Enhanced Core Income Autocallable ETF and $885.1bn for iShares Core S&P 500 ETF.

ACBE on its own →IVV on its own →
At a glance
+2.1%
ACBE total return, since launch, Sep 10, 2026
+13.7%
IVV total return, 1 year
0.60%
ACBE expense ratio
0.03%
IVV expense ratio

Pair scorecard

IVV costs 0.57 points a year less; IVV is far larger, $885.1bn against $3.8m.

ACBE vs IVV: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureACBEIVV
Return
Total return, 1 yearnot published+13.7%
Cash paid, share of starting value, since Sep 10, 20260.6%
Price change, since Sep 10, 2026rose 1.5%
Latest payout, annualized6.8%
Benchmark
What it tracksBenchmark: S&P 500, measured through SPYS&P 500
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.60%0.03%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$3.8m$885.1bn
Holdings
Holdings in commonnot published
In the S&P 500, by weight100%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund38.1%

Method

Side by side

ACBE Pacer Metaurus Enhanced Core Income Autocallable ETF IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Where it sits Income ETF Stock ETF
Issuer Pacer iShares
What it is autocallable, vs SPY Tracks the S&P 500
Total return, 1 year +2.1% (since launch, Sep 10, 2026) +13.7%
Its benchmark over the same days +2.2% (SPY) (since launch, Sep 10, 2026) +13.6% (SPY)
Gap to its benchmark −0.1 pts vs SPY (since launch, Sep 10, 2026) +0.1 pts vs SPY
Expense ratio 0.60% 0.03%
Holdings not yet filed 505
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $3.8m $885.1bn

ACBE and IVV on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief

No client brief for this pair: ETFIQ prints no one-year total return for ACBE.

Alert

ACBE and IVV flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
ACBE

Over the period from its first trade on Sep 10, 2026 to Oct 28, 2026, ACBE paid 0.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 1.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +2.1%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +2.2% over the same days, so a holder was about even. At its price on Oct 28, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.8%, paid periodically.

IVV

IVV tracks the S&P 500. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.7% with distributions reinvested, against +13.6% for its benchmark, the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 505 positions, with the top ten at 38.1%.

Questions people ask

Are ACBE and IVV in the same category?
ACBE is an option-income ETF and IVV is a stock ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
Which is cheaper, ACBE or IVV?
IVV is cheaper, by 0.57 percentage points a year. That is about $57 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
ACBE vs SPYACBE vs VOOACBH vs IVVIVV vs TPRYIVV vs NLSIIVV vs MINYIVV vs YSPYIVV vs JANH
Where to next
S&P 500 (SPY) →ACBE on its own →IVV on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →ACBE dividend history →IVV dividend history →IVV holdings →Standards and sources →
Sources and dates
ACBE filings on SEC EDGAR ↗
ACBE prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗
Pacer website ↗
IVV filings on SEC EDGAR ↗
IVV prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗
iShares page for IVV ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, ACBE against IVV, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/acbe-vs-ivv

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.