INDA · iShares MSCI India ETF
INDA tracks the MSCI India and returned −8.8% over the past year.
Key facts
Its ten largest equity positions
| Holding | Weight | |
|---|---|---|
| RELIANCE INDUSTRIES LIMITED | 6.23% | |
| HDFC BANK LIMITED | 6.15% | |
| ICICI BANK LIMITED | 4.68% | |
| BHARTI AIRTEL LIMITED | 3.63% | |
| INFOSYS LIMITED | 2.92% | |
| AXIS BANK LIMITED | 2.23% | |
| MAHINDRA AND MAHINDRA LIMITED | 2.20% | |
| LARSEN AND TOUBRO LIMITED | 2.13% | |
| BAJAJ FINANCE LIMITED | 1.92% | |
| KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITED | 1.59% |
Compare INDA
Also against BINC, BITO, BND, BNDX, BOND, BOXX, BSV, BWET, CGBL, CGDV, CGGR, COWZ, CTA, DBMF, DFUS, DGRO, DGRW, DIA, DVY, DYNF, EDV, EEM, EFA, EMB, EMXC, EWJ, EWT, EWY, EWZ, EZU, FBCG, FDVV, FENI, FLKR, FNDX, FTEC, FXI, GARP, GLD, GLDM, GOVT, GRNY, HDV, HGER, HYG, HYMB, IALT, IAU, IBB, IDEV, IEF, IEFA, IEI, IEMG, IGIB, IGM, IGSB, IJH, IJR, IJS, IJT, ILF, ITOT, IUSB, IVV, IWB, IWC, IWD, IWF, IWM, IWO, IXUS, IYE, IYR, IYW, JAAA, JNK, KRE, LQD, MAGS, MBB, MDY, MGK, MINT, MOAT, MTUM, MUB, NOBL, ONEQ, PDBC, PFF, PULS, PVAL, QQQ, QQQM, QUAL, RDVY, RSP, SCHB, SCHD, SCHF, SCHG, SCHH, SCHP, SCHX, SDY, SGOV, SHV, SHY, SIVR, SLV, SPHD, SPHQ, SPLG, SPMO, SPSB, SPY, SPYD, SPYG, TIP, TLT, URTH, USFR, USHY, USMV, USO, VB, VBIL, VBK, VBR, VCIT, VCLT, VCSH, VDC, VDE, VEA, VEU, VGIT, VGK, VGLT, VGSH, VGT, VHT, VIG, VLUE, VNQ, VO, VOE, VONG, VOO, VOOG, VOX, VPL, VPU, VT, VTEB, VTI, VTIP, VTV, VTWO, VUG, VUSB, VWO, VXF, VXUS, VYM, VYMI, XBI, XHB, XLB, XLC, XLE, XLF, XLG, XLI, XLK, XLP, XLRE, XLU, XLV, XLY, XOP, XOVR, XRT.
Period by period
| Window | Total return | S&P 500 | Gap to S&P 500 | Gap to Nasdaq-100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 months | +0.5% | +3.3% | −2.8 pts | +1.3 pts |
| 6 months | +1.1% | +16.0% | −15.0 pts | −19.6 pts |
| 1 year | −8.8% | +17.5% | −26.3 pts | −31.8 pts |
| 3 years | +8.6% | +77.9% | −69.3 pts | −86.5 pts |
| Since listing | +110.2% | +631.8% | −521.6 pts | −1096.2 pts |
In plain words
INDA is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI India. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −8.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.61% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 169 positions, with the top ten at 33.7%. It sat 17.4% below its high of Sep 26, 2024 on Sep 11, 2026.
| What it tracks | MSCI India |
|---|---|
| Fund type | Index equity fund |
| Expense ratio (485BPOS XBRL, Dec 19, 2025) | 0.61% |
| Price | $48.57 |
| Listed since | Feb 3, 2012 |
| Net assets (SEC filing, whole fund, as filed for May 31, 2026) | $6.8bn |
| Below its high (ETFIQ) | −17.4% |
| Holdings | 169 |
| Top ten weight | 33.7% |
| Holdings as of (SEC N-PORT) | May 31, 2026 |
| Already in the S&P 500, by weight (ETFIQ) | 0.0% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 (ETFIQ) | 100.0% |
| Already in the Nasdaq-100, by weight (ETFIQ) | 0.0% |
Questions people ask
- How has INDA performed?
- Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, INDA returned −8.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500. Over three years the figure is +8.6%.
- What does INDA cost?
- The prospectus expense ratio is 0.61% a year.
- What does INDA hold?
- 169 positions as filed for May 31, 2026, with the top ten at 33.7% of the fund. 0% of its weight is in stocks the S&P 500 also holds.
- How far is INDA below its high?
- 17.4% below its high of Sep 26, 2024, measured on the reinvested series to Sep 11, 2026.
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Funds near this one
Cite this page. ETFIQ, INDA, core index fund, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/funds/INDA Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
ETFIQ covers leveraged and inverse, thematic, buffer, option-income, core index and spot crypto ETFs. This fund is here because the other funds here are measured against it and portfolios hold it. ETFIQ is an independent publisher and makes no recommendations. Standards and sources