Which returned more over the last year, INDA or PULS?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, INDA returned −8.8% and PULS returned +4.2%, so PULS returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, INDA or PULS?

INDA charges 0.61% a year and PULS charges 0.15%, so PULS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

INDA vs PULS: how they differ

INDA and PULS hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and PULS returned more over the year.

iShares MSCI India ETF and PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, INDA and PULS hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in INDA	Only in PULS
RELIANCE INDUSTRIES LIMITED 6.23%	PGIM ETF Trust 2.38%
HDFC BANK LIMITED 6.15%	GLENCORE FUNDING LLC 0.98%
ICICI BANK LIMITED 4.68%	Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. 0.87%
BHARTI AIRTEL LIMITED 3.63%	ABN AMRO BANK NV 0.75%
INFOSYS LIMITED 2.92%	BX TRUST 2022-LBA6 0.68%
AXIS BANK LIMITED 2.23%	FEDERATION DES CAISSES DESJARDINS DU QUE 0.67%
MAHINDRA AND MAHINDRA LIMITED 2.20%	BX TRUST 2018-BILT 0.56%
LARSEN AND TOUBRO LIMITED 2.13%	BROADCOM INC 0.56%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 29, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

INDA and PULS on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	INDA iShares MSCI India ETF	PULS PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	PGIM
What it is	MSCI India	PGIM Ultra Short Bond
Total return, 1 year	−8.8%	+4.2%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−26.3 pts	−13.3 pts
Expense ratio	0.61%	0.15%
Holdings	169	553

INDA in plain words

INDA is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI India. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −8.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.61% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 169 positions, with the top ten at 33.7%. It sat 17.4% below its high of Sep 26, 2024 on Sep 11, 2026.

PULS in plain words

PULS is a cash and treasury bills tracking the PGIM Ultra Short Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +4.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, INDA or PULS?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, INDA returned −8.8% and PULS returned +4.2%, so PULS returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, INDA or PULS?: INDA charges 0.61% a year and PULS charges 0.15%, so PULS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

INDA against PULS, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, INDA against PULS, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/INDA-PULS Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources