Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

ACWI vs INDA: how they differ

ACWI and INDA hold 1% of their weight in the same names, and ACWI returned more over the year.

iShares MSCI ACWI ETF and iShares MSCI India ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ACWI and INDA hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions ACWI and INDA both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingACWIINDA
HDFC BANK LIMITED0.09%6.15%
RELIANCE INDUSTRIES LIMITED0.09%6.23%
ICICI BANK LIMITED0.07%4.68%
BHARTI AIRTEL LIMITED0.05%3.63%
INFOSYS LIMITED0.04%2.92%
MAHINDRA AND MAHINDRA LIMITED0.03%2.20%
AXIS BANK LIMITED0.03%2.23%
BAJAJ FINANCE LIMITED0.03%1.92%
LARSEN AND TOUBRO LIMITED0.03%2.13%
TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES LIMITED0.02%1.54%
KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITED0.02%1.59%
State Bank of India0.02%1.35%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in ACWIOnly in INDA
NVIDIA CORPORATION 4.89%MALCO ENERGY LIMITED 0.12%
APPLE INC. 4.02%TALWANDI SABO POWER LIMITED 0.12%
MICROSOFT CORPORATION 2.90%VEDANTA ALUMINIUM METAL LIMITED 0.12%
AMAZON.COM, INC. 2.58%INDIAN RUPEE 0.05%
ALPHABET INC. 2.26%
BROADCOM INC. 1.90%
ALPHABET INC. 1.87%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Compa 1.73%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

ACWI and INDA on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF
INDA
iShares MSCI India ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesiShares
What it isMSCI ACWIMSCI India
Total return, 1 year+19.1%−8.8%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+1.6 pts−26.3 pts
Expense ratio0.32%0.61%
Already in the S&P 50061.4%0.0%
Holdings2307169

ACWI in plain words

ACWI is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI ACWI. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +19.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.32% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 61% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2307 positions, with the top ten at 24.6%.

INDA in plain words

INDA is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI India. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −8.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.61% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 169 positions, with the top ten at 33.7%. It sat 17.4% below its high of Sep 26, 2024 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ACWI or INDA?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ACWI returned +19.1% and INDA returned −8.8%, so ACWI returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, ACWI or INDA?
ACWI charges 0.32% a year and INDA charges 0.61%, so ACWI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do ACWI and INDA overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 61% of ACWI and 0% of INDA by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 1% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ACWI against INDA, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACWI against INDA, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ACWI-INDA Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources