Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

INDA vs MAGS: how they differ

INDA and MAGS hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and MAGS returned more over the year.

iShares MSCI India ETF and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, INDA and MAGS hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in INDAOnly in MAGS
RELIANCE INDUSTRIES LIMITED 6.23%TREASURY BILL 65.41%
HDFC BANK LIMITED 6.15%Roundhill Ultra Short Duration 8.06%
ICICI BANK LIMITED 4.68%NVIDIA Corp 4.15%
BHARTI AIRTEL LIMITED 3.63%Apple Inc 4.12%
INFOSYS LIMITED 2.92%Amazon.com Inc 4.11%
AXIS BANK LIMITED 2.23%Tesla Inc 4.07%
MAHINDRA AND MAHINDRA LIMITED 2.20%Microsoft Corp 3.62%
LARSEN AND TOUBRO LIMITED 2.13%Meta Platforms Inc 3.59%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

INDA and MAGS on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
INDA
iShares MSCI India ETF
MAGS
Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesRoundhill
What it isMSCI IndiaMagnificent Seven
Total return, 1 year−8.8%+14.4%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−26.3 pts−3.1 pts
Expense ratio0.61%0.30%
Already in the S&P 5000.0%26.5%
Holdings1699

INDA in plain words

INDA is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI India. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −8.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.61% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 169 positions, with the top ten at 33.7%. It sat 17.4% below its high of Sep 26, 2024 on Sep 11, 2026.

MAGS in plain words

MAGS is an index equity fund tracking the Magnificent Seven. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +14.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 26% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 9 positions, with the top ten at 100.0%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, INDA or MAGS?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, INDA returned −8.8% and MAGS returned +14.4%, so MAGS returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, INDA or MAGS?
INDA charges 0.61% a year and MAGS charges 0.30%, so MAGS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do INDA and MAGS overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of INDA and 26% of MAGS by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

INDA against MAGS, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, INDA against MAGS, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/INDA-MAGS Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources