Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

EEM vs INDA: how they differ

EEM and INDA hold 11% of their weight in the same names, and EEM returned more over the year.

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF and iShares MSCI India ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, EEM and INDA hold 11% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions EEM and INDA both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingEEMINDA
HDFC BANK LIMITED0.70%6.15%
RELIANCE INDUSTRIES LIMITED0.66%6.23%
ICICI BANK LIMITED0.55%4.68%
BHARTI AIRTEL LIMITED0.39%3.63%
INFOSYS LIMITED0.31%2.92%
AXIS BANK LIMITED0.24%2.23%
MAHINDRA AND MAHINDRA LIMITED0.23%2.20%
LARSEN AND TOUBRO LIMITED0.23%2.13%
BAJAJ FINANCE LIMITED0.21%1.92%
KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITED0.17%1.59%
TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES LIMITED0.17%1.54%
State Bank of India0.15%1.35%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in EEMOnly in INDA
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Compa 14.28%
SK hynix Inc. 6.65%
Tencent Holdings Limited 2.71%
Alibaba Group Holding Limited 2.08%
MediaTek Inc. 1.62%
DELTA ELECTRONICS, INC. 1.17%
HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY CO., LTD. 0.90%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 0.85%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.

EEM and INDA on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
EEM
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
INDA
iShares MSCI India ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesiShares
What it isEmerging marketsMSCI India
Total return, 1 year+32.3%−8.8%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+14.8 pts−26.3 pts
Expense ratio0.72%0.61%
Already in the S&P 5000.0%0.0%
Holdings1245169

EEM in plain words

EEM is an index equity fund tracking the Emerging markets. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +32.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.72% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1245 positions, with the top ten at 38.9%. It sat 4.7% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

INDA in plain words

INDA is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI India. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −8.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.61% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 169 positions, with the top ten at 33.7%. It sat 17.4% below its high of Sep 26, 2024 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EEM or INDA?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EEM returned +32.3% and INDA returned −8.8%, so EEM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, EEM or INDA?
EEM charges 0.72% a year and INDA charges 0.61%, so INDA is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do EEM and INDA overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of EEM and 0% of INDA by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 11% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

EEM against INDA, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, EEM against INDA, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/EEM-INDA Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources