Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

AIRR vs EEM: how they differ

Over the year EEM returned more, +32.3% against +15.0%, and AIRR charges 0.69% against 0.72%.

First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, AIRR and EEM hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in AIRROnly in EEM
STERLING INFRASTRUCTURE INC 6.00%Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Compa 14.28%
ARGAN INC 4.73%SK hynix Inc. 6.65%
COMFORT SYSTEMS USA INC 4.42%Tencent Holdings Limited 2.71%
MASTEC INC 4.18%Alibaba Group Holding Limited 2.08%
CH ROBINSON WORLDWIDE INC 4.08%MediaTek Inc. 1.62%
OWENS CORNING 3.90%DELTA ELECTRONICS, INC. 1.17%
DYCOM INDUSTRIES INC 3.76%HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY CO., LTD. 0.90%
EMCOR GROUP INC 3.75%Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 0.85%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

AIRR and EEM on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
AIRR
First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF
EEM
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
Where it sitsThematic ETFCore index fund
IssuerFirst TrustiShares
What it isReshoring and manufacturingEmerging markets
Total return, 1 year+15.0%+32.3%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−2.5 pts+14.8 pts
Expense ratio0.69%0.72%
Already in the S&P 5005.5%0.0%
Holdings581245

AIRR in plain words

By weight, 6% of AIRR's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 30% of the fund across 58 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 10, 2026. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 the fund returned +15.0% with distributions reinvested against +17.5% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 2.5 pts. It sits 19.5% below its all-time high of Jun 22, 2026.

EEM in plain words

EEM is an index equity fund tracking the Emerging markets. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +32.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.72% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1245 positions, with the top ten at 38.9%. It sat 4.7% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, AIRR or EEM?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AIRR returned +15.0% and EEM returned +32.3%, so EEM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, AIRR or EEM?
AIRR charges 0.69% a year and EEM charges 0.72%, so AIRR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do AIRR and EEM overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 6% of AIRR and 0% of EEM by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Are AIRR and EEM the same kind of fund?
No. AIRR is a thematic ETF and EEM is an index ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

AIRR against EEM, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, AIRR against EEM, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/AIRR-EEM Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources