Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

EMXC vs INDA: how they differ

EMXC and INDA hold 14% of their weight in the same names, and EMXC returned more over the year.

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF and iShares MSCI India ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, EMXC and INDA hold 14% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions EMXC and INDA both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingEMXCINDA
HDFC BANK LIMITED0.88%6.15%
RELIANCE INDUSTRIES LIMITED0.83%6.23%
ICICI BANK LIMITED0.69%4.68%
BHARTI AIRTEL LIMITED0.49%3.63%
INFOSYS LIMITED0.39%2.92%
AXIS BANK LIMITED0.30%2.23%
MAHINDRA AND MAHINDRA LIMITED0.29%2.20%
LARSEN AND TOUBRO LIMITED0.28%2.13%
BAJAJ FINANCE LIMITED0.27%1.92%
KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITED0.21%1.59%
TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES LIMITED0.21%1.54%
State Bank of India0.18%1.35%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in EMXCOnly in INDA
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Compa 17.97%
SK hynix Inc. 8.37%
MediaTek Inc. 2.04%
DELTA ELECTRONICS, INC. 1.47%
HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY CO., LTD. 1.13%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 1.07%
SAMSUNG ELECTRO-MECHANICS CO.,LTD 0.78%
SK Square Co., Ltd. 0.75%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.

EMXC and INDA on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
EMXC
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF
INDA
iShares MSCI India ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesiShares
What it isMSCI Emerging Markets ex ChinaMSCI India
Total return, 1 year+55.5%−8.8%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+38.0 pts−26.3 pts
Expense ratio0.25%0.61%
Already in the S&P 5000.0%0.0%
Holdings662169

EMXC in plain words

EMXC is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +55.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 662 positions, with the top ten at 44.3%. It sat 5.5% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

INDA in plain words

INDA is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI India. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −8.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.61% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 169 positions, with the top ten at 33.7%. It sat 17.4% below its high of Sep 26, 2024 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EMXC or INDA?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EMXC returned +55.5% and INDA returned −8.8%, so EMXC returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, EMXC or INDA?
EMXC charges 0.25% a year and INDA charges 0.61%, so EMXC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do EMXC and INDA overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of EMXC and 0% of INDA by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 14% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

EMXC against INDA, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, EMXC against INDA, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/EMXC-INDA Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources