Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Thematic ETFs

RING vs SILJ: Holdings Overlap & Returns

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, RING returned +28.4% to SILJ's +19.6%; 15% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about RING and SILJ

Net assets: $2.3bn on Nov 4, 2026 for iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF, and $2.9bn on Nov 3, 2026 for Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF.

At a glance
17.6%
RING in the S&P 500
0.0%
SILJ in the S&P 500
+28.4%
RING total return, 1 year
+19.6%
SILJ total return, 1 year
RING · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 82% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
82% of its weight is outside the S&P 50018% of RING's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 82% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 3, 2026.18%82%in the S&P 500of its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 68% of the fund · 41 holdings as published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 0% in82% of its weight is outside the S&P 50018% of RING's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 82% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 3, 2026.18%82%inof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · Nasdaq-100: 0% in

18% of RING's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 82% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 3, 2026.

SILJ · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 100% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
100% of its weight is outside the S&P 5000% of SILJ's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 4, 2026.0%100%0% of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 60% of the fund · 66 holdings as published by its issuer for Nov 4, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 0% in100% of its weight is outside the S&P 5000% of SILJ's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 4, 2026.0%100%0% of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · Nasdaq-100: 0% in

0% of SILJ's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 4, 2026.

Pair scorecard

RING costs 0.30 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 8.8 points; SILJ is 1.4 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

RING vs SILJ: Holdings Overlap & Returns
MeasureRINGSILJ
Return
Total return, 1 year+28.4%+19.6%
Drawdown
Below its all-time high25.1%, high on Feb 27, 202639.4%, high on Feb 27, 2026
Against its benchmark
What it tracksGold minersSilver miners
Its benchmark, total return, 1 year+15.0%
Against its benchmark, 1 yearahead by 13.4 pts
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.39%0.69%
Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026$2.1bn$2.9bn
Holdings
Holdings in common15%

Method

Risk and return

Dec 7, 2012 to Oct 30, 2026 · 725 weekly returns
RING SILJ
Return
Total return edge RING +108.5% +38.8%
Annualized edge RING +5.4% +2.4%
Price return edge RING +74.6% +17.1%
Risk
Volatility edge RING 37.7% 45.2%
Max drawdown edge RING (slight) −72.0% −78.9%
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge RING 0.28 0.24
Sortino edge RING 0.41 0.35
Calmar edge RING 0.08 0.03
Reading

From Dec 2012 to Oct 2026, RING returned more: +108.5% to +38.8%. RING swung less: 37.7% to 45.2%. RING fell slightly less at its worst: −72.0% to −78.9%.

Full scorecard

9 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: RING vs SILJ: Holdings Overlap & Returns
MeasureRINGSILJEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+108.5%+38.8%RINGPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+5.4%+2.4%RINGTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+74.6%+17.1%RINGPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility37.7%45.2%RINGSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation25.7%30.8%RINGLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−72.0%−78.9%RING (slight)Deepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.280.24RINGReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.410.35RINGReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Calmar0.080.03RINGAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 725 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

15%

By the books each fund has filed, RING and SILJ hold 15% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Nov 3, 2026 and Nov 4, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

15% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first RING SILJ
WHEATON PRECIOUS METALS 7.33% 6.31%
PAN AMERICAN SILVER 3.02% 3.02%
COEUR MINING 2.84% 9.50%
SSR MINING 1.48% 4.61%
HOCHSCHILD MINING PLC 0.75% 1.25%
MCEWEN INC 0.33% 0.65%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in RING
NEWMONT 17.65%
AGNICO EAGLE MINES 12.79%
BARRICK MINING 8.72%
GOLD FIELDS 4.51%
ANGLOGOLD ASHANTI PLC 4.40%
KINROSS GOLD 3.74%
EQUINOX GOLD 2.47%
ALAMOS GOLD CLASS A 2.36%
Only in SILJ
Hecla Mining Co 10.28%
First Majestic Silver Corp 9.95%
Boliden AB 4.68%
Aya Gold & Silver Inc 4.32%
Endeavour Silver Corp 3.54%
Cia de Minas Buenaventura SAA 3.31%
OR Royalties Inc 3.14%
Hycroft Mining Holding Corp 3.05%
Check overlap with more funds →

Window by window

Window by window: RING vs SILJ: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Total returnvs its benchmark
WindowRINGSILJRINGSILJ
3 months+2.4%−12.0%+3.7 pts vs ACWInot measured
6 months−7.2%−21.4%−9.8 pts vs ACWInot measured
1 year+28.4%+19.6%+13.4 pts vs ACWInot measured
3 years+233.8%+205.4%+156.2 pts vs ACWInot measured
Since launchNot the same days: RING Feb 2012 · SILJ Nov 2012+74.0%+42.1%−293.7 pts vs ACWInot measured

Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

RING iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF · Holds 41 stocks in gold miners, 18% of its weight in S&P 500 companies SILJ Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF · Holds 66 stocks in silver miners, 0% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
Theme Gold miners Silver miners
In the S&P 500 17.6% 0.0%
Active share vs the S&P 500 99.8% 100.0%
In the Nasdaq-100 0.0% 0.0%
Holdings 41 66
Top ten, share of the fund 67.5% 59.6%
Expense ratio 0.39% 0.69%
Fee for the differing part 0.39% 0.69%
Total return, 1 year +28.4% +19.6%
vs its benchmark +13.4 pts vs ACWI not measured
Below its high −25.1% −39.4%
Net assets, RING as of Nov 4, 2026 and SILJ as of Nov 3, 2026 $2.3bn $2.9bn

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

15% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Client brief:

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

RING and SILJ flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
RING

By weight, 18% of RING's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 68% of the fund across 41 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +28.4% with distributions reinvested against +15.0% for its benchmark, the MSCI All Country World Index, so a holder was ahead by 13.4 pts. It sits 25.1% below its all-time high of Feb 27, 2026.

SILJ

By weight, 0% of SILJ's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 60% of the fund across 66 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 4, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +19.6% with distributions reinvested. It sits 39.4% below its all-time high of Feb 27, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do RING and SILJ hold the same stocks?
By their latest filings, 15% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, RING or SILJ?
RING has 18% of its weight in S&P 500 names and SILJ has 0%, so SILJ differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, RING or SILJ?
RING charges 0.39% a year and SILJ charges 0.69%, so RING is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, RING against SILJ, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/ring-vs-silj

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.