Data as of .
RING vs SILJ: which is really different?
RING and SILJ hold 15% of their weight in the same names, and SILJ returned more over the year.
ETFIQ Off-Index Score: SILJ scores higher
How much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?
A percentile among the 379 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
15% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, RING and SILJ hold 15% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | RING | SILJ |
|---|---|---|
| WHEATON PRECIOUS METALS | 7.58% | 5.83% |
| COEUR MINING | 3.38% | 10.38% |
| PAN AMERICAN SILVER | 3.18% | 2.94% |
| SSR MINING | 1.67% | 4.81% |
| HOCHSCHILD MINING PLC | 0.83% | 1.29% |
| MCEWEN INC | 0.38% | 0.67% |
| CAD CASH | 0.10% | 0.16% |
| GBP CASH | 0.01% | 0.01% |
| Only in RING | Only in SILJ |
|---|---|
| NEWMONT 16.36% | Hecla Mining Co 10.49% |
| AGNICO EAGLE MINES 12.29% | First Majestic Silver Corp 10.35% |
| BARRICK MINING 8.16% | Aya Gold & Silver Inc 3.91% |
| GOLD FIELDS 4.35% | Boliden AB 3.89% |
| ANGLOGOLD ASHANTI PLC 4.28% | Endeavour Silver Corp 3.73% |
| KINROSS GOLD 4.25% | Cia de Minas Buenaventura SAA 3.16% |
| ALAMOS GOLD CLASS A 2.50% | Perpetua Resources Corp 3.10% |
| EQUINOX GOLD 2.49% | Hycroft Mining Holding Corp 3.01% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RING | SILJ | RING | SILJ | RING | SILJ | |
| 3 months | +17.9% | +8.1% | +15.6 pts | +5.9 pts | +20.3 pts | +10.6 pts |
| 6 months | +21.9% | +14.8% | +3.9 pts | −3.3 pts | −2.3 pts | −9.5 pts |
| 1 year | +45.3% | +53.2% | +28.7 pts | +36.6 pts | +23.5 pts | +31.4 pts |
| 3 years | +286.7% | +263.6% | +208.3 pts | +185.2 pts | +188.5 pts | +165.5 pts |
| Since launch | +97.9% | +75.8% | −543.5 pts | −506.2 pts | −1138.6 pts | −1057.0 pts |
| RING iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF Holds 55 stocks in gold miners, 16% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | SILJ Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF Holds 70 stocks in silver miners, 0% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | iShares | Amplify |
| Theme | Gold miners | Silver miners |
| In the S&P 500 | 16.4% | 0.0% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 99.8% | 100.0% |
| In the Nasdaq-100 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Holdings | 55 | 70 |
| Top ten, share of the fund | 67.0% | 59.7% |
| Expense ratio | 0.39% | 0.69% |
| Fee for the differing part | 0.39% | 0.69% |
| Total return, 1 year | +45.3% | +53.2% |
| vs the S&P 500 | +28.7 pts | +36.6 pts |
| vs the Nasdaq-100 | +23.5 pts | +31.4 pts |
| Below its high | −14.8% | −25.1% |
| Net assets | $2.5bn | $3.9bn |
RING in plain words
By weight, 16% of RING's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 67% of the fund across 55 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 18, 2026. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 the fund returned +45.3% with distributions reinvested against +16.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 28.7 pts. It sits 14.8% below its all-time high of Feb 27, 2026.
SILJ in plain words
By weight, 0% of SILJ's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 60% of the fund across 70 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 21, 2026. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 the fund returned +53.2% with distributions reinvested against +16.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 36.6 pts. It sits 25.1% below its all-time high of Feb 27, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Do RING and SILJ hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 15% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
- Which is more different from the S&P 500, RING or SILJ?
- RING has 16% of its weight in S&P 500 names and SILJ has 0%, so SILJ differs more from the index.
- Which is cheaper, RING or SILJ?
- RING charges 0.39% a year and SILJ charges 0.69%, so RING is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, RING against SILJ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/ring-vs-silj Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.