Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Thematic ETFs

PICK vs SILJ: Holdings Overlap & Returns

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, PICK returned +28.0% to SILJ's +19.6%; 1% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about PICK and SILJ

Net assets on Nov 3, 2026: $2.1bn for iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF and $2.9bn for Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF.

At a glance
12.8%
PICK in the S&P 500
0.0%
SILJ in the S&P 500
+28.0%
PICK total return, 1 year
+19.6%
SILJ total return, 1 year
PICK · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 87% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
87% of its weight is outside the S&P 50013% of PICK's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 87% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 3, 2026.13%87%inof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 49% of the fund · 259 holdings as published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 0% in87% of its weight is outside the S&P 50013% of PICK's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 87% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 3, 2026.13%87%inof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · Nasdaq-100: 0% in

13% of PICK's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 87% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 3, 2026.

SILJ · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 100% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
100% of its weight is outside the S&P 5000% of SILJ's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 4, 2026.0%100%0% of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 60% of the fund · 66 holdings as published by its issuer for Nov 4, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 0% in100% of its weight is outside the S&P 5000% of SILJ's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 4, 2026.0%100%0% of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · Nasdaq-100: 0% in

0% of SILJ's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 4, 2026.

Pair scorecard

PICK costs 0.30 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 8.4 points; SILJ is 1.4 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

PICK vs SILJ: Holdings Overlap & Returns
MeasurePICKSILJ
Return
Total return, 1 year+28.0%+19.6%
Drawdown
Below its all-time high18.4%, high on Jun 2, 202639.4%, high on Feb 27, 2026
Against its benchmark
What it tracksMiners and metalsSilver miners
Its benchmark, total return, 1 year+15.0%
Against its benchmark, 1 yearahead by 13.0 pts
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.39%0.69%
Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026$2.1bn$2.9bn
Holdings
Holdings in common1%

Method

Risk and return

Dec 7, 2012 to Oct 30, 2026 · 725 weekly returns
PICK SILJ
Return
Total return edge PICK +131.5% +38.8%
Annualized edge PICK +6.2% +2.4%
Price return edge PICK +29.6% +17.1%
Risk
Volatility edge PICK 28.8% 45.2%
Max drawdown edge PICK −64.5% −78.9%
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge PICK 0.29 0.24
Sortino edge PICK 0.42 0.35
Calmar edge PICK 0.10 0.03
Reading

From Dec 2012 to Oct 2026, PICK returned more: +131.5% to +38.8%. PICK swung less: 28.8% to 45.2%. PICK fell less at its worst: −64.5% to −78.9%.

Full scorecard

9 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: PICK vs SILJ: Holdings Overlap & Returns
MeasurePICKSILJEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+131.5%+38.8%PICKPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+6.2%+2.4%PICKTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+29.6%+17.1%PICKPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility28.8%45.2%PICKSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation19.6%30.8%PICKLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−64.5%−78.9%PICKDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.290.24PICKReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.420.35PICKReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Calmar0.100.03PICKAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 725 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

1%

By the books each fund has filed, PICK and SILJ hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Nov 3, 2026 and Nov 4, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

1% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first PICK SILJ
KGHM POLSKA MIEDZ SA 0.68% 0.88%
BUENAVENTURA ADR REPRESENTING 0.31% 3.31%
OSISKO METALS INC 0.04% 0.52%
TRILOGY METALS 0.02% 0.53%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in PICK
BHP GROUP LTD 13.95%
FREEPORT MCMORAN INC 6.19%
RIO TINTO 6.07%
GLENCORE PLC 4.43%
NUCOR 4.24%
ANGLO AMERICAN PLC 3.69%
CIA VALE DO RIO DOCE SH 2.80%
RIO TINTO 2.63%
Only in SILJ
Hecla Mining Co 10.28%
First Majestic Silver Corp 9.95%
COEUR MINING INC. 9.50%
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp 6.31%
Boliden AB 4.68%
SSR Mining Inc 4.61%
Aya Gold & Silver Inc 4.32%
Endeavour Silver Corp 3.54%
Check overlap with more funds →

Window by window

Window by window: PICK vs SILJ: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Total returnvs its benchmark
WindowPICKSILJPICKSILJ
3 months−11.8%−12.0%−10.5 pts vs ACWInot measured
6 months−12.8%−21.4%−15.4 pts vs ACWInot measured
1 year+28.0%+19.6%+13.0 pts vs ACWInot measured
3 years+57.0%+205.4%−20.6 pts vs ACWInot measured
Since launchNot the same days: PICK Feb 2012 · SILJ Nov 2012+93.0%+42.1%−274.7 pts vs ACWInot measured

Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

PICK iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF · Holds 259 stocks in miners and metals, 13% of its weight in S&P 500 companies SILJ Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF · Holds 66 stocks in silver miners, 0% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
Theme Miners and metals Silver miners
In the S&P 500 12.8% 0.0%
Active share vs the S&P 500 99.7% 100.0%
In the Nasdaq-100 0.0% 0.0%
Holdings 259 66
Top ten, share of the fund 48.8% 59.6%
Expense ratio 0.39% 0.69%
Fee for the differing part 0.39% 0.69%
Total return, 1 year +28.0% +19.6%
vs its benchmark +13.0 pts vs ACWI not measured
Below its high −18.4% −39.4%
Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026 $2.1bn $2.9bn

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

1% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Client brief:

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

PICK and SILJ flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
PICK

By weight, 13% of PICK's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 49% of the fund across 259 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +28.0% with distributions reinvested against +15.0% for its benchmark, the MSCI All Country World Index, so a holder was ahead by 13.0 pts. It sits 18.4% below its all-time high of Jun 2, 2026.

SILJ

By weight, 0% of SILJ's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 60% of the fund across 66 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 4, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +19.6% with distributions reinvested. It sits 39.4% below its all-time high of Feb 27, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do PICK and SILJ hold the same stocks?
By their latest filings, 1% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, PICK or SILJ?
PICK has 13% of its weight in S&P 500 names and SILJ has 0%, so SILJ differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, PICK or SILJ?
PICK charges 0.39% a year and SILJ charges 0.69%, so PICK is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, PICK against SILJ, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/pick-vs-silj

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.