Do PAVE and URA hold the same stocks?

By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.

Which is more different from the S&P 500, PAVE or URA?

PAVE has 62% of its weight in S&P 500 names and URA has 0%, so URA differs more from the index.

Which is cheaper, PAVE or URA?

PAVE charges 0.47% a year and URA charges 0.69%, so PAVE is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

Thematic ETFs

PAVE vs URA: Holdings Overlap & Returns

Share on X Download as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, PAVE returned +11.4% to URA's −30.3%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about PAVE and URA

Net assets on Oct 12, 2026: $13.6bn for Global X U.S. Infrastructure Development ETF and $5.4bn for Global X Uranium ETF.

PAVE on its own →URA on its own →

At a glance

62.1%

PAVE in the S&P 500

0.0%

URA in the S&P 500

+11.4%

PAVE total return, 1 year

−30.3%

URA total return, 1 year

PAVE · 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 38% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

62% of PAVE's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 38% is outside the index. Holdings as of May 31, 2026.

URA · 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 100% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

0% of URA's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jul 31, 2026.

Pair scorecard

PAVE costs 0.22 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 41.7 points; PAVE is 2.5 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

PAVE vs URA: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Measure	PAVE	URA
Return
Measure	PAVE	URA
Total return, 1 year	+11.4%	−30.3%
Drawdown
Measure	PAVE	URA
Below its all-time high	10.9%, high on Jun 25, 2026	58.4%, high on Feb 2, 2011
Against its benchmark
Measure	PAVE	URA
What it tracks	Infrastructure	Nuclear and uranium
Its benchmark, total return, 1 year		+13.4%
Against its benchmark, 1 year		behind by 43.7 pts
Cost and size
Measure	PAVE	URA
Expense ratio	0.47%	0.69%
Net assets, as of Oct 12, 2026	$13.6bn	$5.4bn
Holdings
Measure	PAVE	URA
Holdings in common	0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Mar 17, 2017 to Oct 23, 2026 · 501 weekly returns

PAVE URA

Return

Total return edge PAVE +267.9% +169.9%

Annualized edge PAVE +14.5% +10.9%

Price return edge PAVE +246.3% +107.6%

Risk

Volatility edge PAVE 24.0% 37.2%

Max drawdown edge PAVE −42.2% −53.1%

Risk-adjusted

Sharpe edge PAVE 0.58 0.39

Sortino edge PAVE 0.84 0.59

Calmar edge PAVE 0.34 0.20

Reading

PAVE returned more: +267.9% to +169.9%. PAVE swung less: 24.0% to 37.2%. PAVE fell less at its worst: −42.2% to −53.1%.

Full scorecard

9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓

Risk and return: PAVE vs URA: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Measure	PAVE	URA	Edge	How it is measured
Return
Total return	+267.9%	+169.9%	PAVE	Price change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized	+14.5%	+10.9%	PAVE	Total return as a yearly rate.
Price return	+246.3%	+107.6%	PAVE	Price change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility	24.0%	37.2%	PAVE	Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation	16.5%	24.5%	PAVE	Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown	−42.2%	−53.1%	PAVE	Deepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe	0.58	0.39	PAVE	Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino	0.84	0.59	PAVE	Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Calmar	0.34	0.20	PAVE	Annualized return divided by the max drawdown.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 501 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

By the books each fund has filed, PAVE and URA hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.

50%

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first PAVE URA

Only in one fund ↓

Only in PAVE

QUANTA SERVICES, INC. 4.18%

CSX Corporation 3.48%

EATON CORPORATION PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY 3.30%

HOWMET AEROSPACE INC. 3.27%

TRANE TECHNOLOGIES PLC 3.19%

UNION PACIFIC CORPORATION 3.12%

NUCOR CORPORATION 3.10%

ROCKWELL AUTOMATION, INC. 2.92%

Only in URA

CAMECO CORPORATION 22.18%

Sprott Physical Uranium Trust 6.74%

Oklo Inc 6.09%

NEXGEN ENERGY LTD. 6.07%

URANIUM ENERGY CORP. 4.81%

Joint stock company National atomic company Kazatomprom 4.40%

CENTRUS ENERGY CORP. 3.46%

PALADIN ENERGY LTD 3.14%

Check overlap with more funds →

Window by window

Window by window: PAVE vs URA: Holdings Overlap & Returns
	Total return		vs its benchmark
Window	PAVE	URA	PAVE	URA
3 months	−3.0%	−2.6%	not measured	−7.0 pts vs ACWI
6 months	−3.1%	−30.9%	not measured	−38.3 pts vs ACWI
1 year	+11.4%	−30.3%	not measured	−43.7 pts vs ACWI
3 years	+92.8%	+65.5%	not measured	−23.4 pts vs ACWI
Since launchNot the same days: PAVE Mar 2017 · URA Nov 2010	+284.2%	−45.1%	not measured	−417.4 pts vs ACWI

Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

PAVE Global X U.S. Infrastructure Development ETF · Holds 100 stocks in infrastructure, 62% of its weight in S&P 500 companies URA Global X Uranium ETF · Holds 57 stocks in nuclear and uranium, 0% of its weight in S&P 500 companies

Issuer Global X Global X

Theme Infrastructure Nuclear and uranium

In the S&P 500 62.1% 0.0%

Active share vs the S&P 500 97.2% 100.0%

In the Nasdaq-100 6.2% 0.0%

Holdings 100 57

Top ten, share of the fund 32.3% 63.0%

Expense ratio 0.47% 0.69%

Fee for the differing part 0.48% 0.69%

Total return, 1 year +11.4% −30.3%

vs its benchmark not measured −43.7 pts vs ACWI

Below its high −10.9% −58.4%

Net assets, as of Oct 12, 2026 $13.6bn $5.4bn

As of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-44CD827F46

PAVE and URA are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

Theme. PAVE covers Infrastructure and URA covers Nuclear and uranium.
Concentration. The top ten holdings are 32.3% of PAVE and 63.0% of URA, a gap of 30.7 points.
What each follows. PAVE follows Infrastructure and URA follows Nuclear and uranium.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

About each fund

PAVE

By weight, 62% of PAVE's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 97%. The top ten holdings are 32% of the fund across 100 positions, as filed for May 31, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned +11.4% with distributions reinvested. It sits 10.9% below its all-time high of Jun 25, 2026.

URA

By weight, 0% of URA's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 63% of the fund across 57 positions, as filed for Jul 31, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned −30.3% with distributions reinvested against +13.4% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI Index, so a holder was behind by 43.7 pts. It sits 58.4% below its all-time high of Feb 2, 2011.

Questions people ask

Do PAVE and URA hold the same stocks?: By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, PAVE or URA?: PAVE has 62% of its weight in S&P 500 names and URA has 0%, so URA differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, PAVE or URA?: PAVE charges 0.47% a year and URA charges 0.69%, so PAVE is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

PAVE vs NLR PAVE vs FDN PAVE vs SIL PAVE vs XME URA vs IGF URA vs IFRA URA vs AIRR URA vs ARKG

Where to next

All thematic ETFs ranked by the S&P 500 Difference Score →How the scores are computed →PAVE on its own →URA on its own →PAVE dividend history →PAVE holdings →URA dividend history →URA holdings →Method →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

PAVE and URA filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

PAVE prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

Global X page for PAVE ↗

URA prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

Global X page for URA ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, PAVE against URA, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/pave-vs-ura

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.