Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
NLR vs XT: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, NLR returned −35.8% to XT's +22.1%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about NLR and XT
Net assets: $3.1bn on Oct 26, 2026 for VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF, and $4.1bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF.
15% of NLR's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 85% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jun 30, 2026.
66% of XT's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 35% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 27, 2026.
Pair scorecard
XT costs 0.06 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 57.9 points; XT is 1.3 times larger.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | NLR | XT |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | −35.8% | +22.1% |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Nuclear and uranium | Broad innovation and megatrends |
| Its benchmark, total return, 1 year | +13.4% | +13.4% |
| Against its benchmark, 1 year | behind by 49.2 pts | ahead by 8.7 pts |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.52% | 0.46% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 26, 2026 | $3.1bn | $4.0bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, NLR and XT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Window by window
| Total return | vs its benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | NLR | XT | NLR | XT |
| 3 months | −6.5% | +10.2% | −10.9 pts vs ACWI | +5.8 pts vs ACWI |
| 6 months | −30.2% | +14.0% | −37.6 pts vs ACWI | +6.6 pts vs ACWI |
| 1 year | −35.8% | +22.1% | −49.2 pts vs ACWI | +8.7 pts vs ACWI |
| 3 years | +54.0% | +93.2% | −34.9 pts vs ACWI | +4.3 pts vs ACWI |
| Since launchNot the same days: NLR Aug 2007 · XT Mar 2015 | +66.1% | +297.8% | not measured | +71.7 pts vs ACWI |
Side by side
As of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
NLR
By weight, 15% of NLR's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 61% of the fund across 25 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned −35.8% with distributions reinvested against +13.4% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI Index, so a holder was behind by 49.2 pts. It sits 41.6% below its all-time high of Jan 28, 2026.
XT
By weight, 66% of XT's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 69%. The top ten holdings are 37% of the fund across 197 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned +22.1% with distributions reinvested against +13.4% for its benchmark, the MSCI All Country World Index, so a holder was ahead by 8.7 pts.
Questions people ask
- Do NLR and XT hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, NLR against XT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/nlr-vs-xt
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). NLR against XT. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/nlr-vs-xt
[NLR against XT (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/nlr-vs-xt)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.