Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

NATO vs PPA: which is really different?

NATO and PPA hold 58% of their weight in the same names, and PPA returned more over the year.

Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF and Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF.

58.4%NATO in the S&P 500
71.7%PPA in the S&P 500
+0.6%NATO total return, 1 year
+6.0%PPA total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Off-Index Score: NATO scores higher

How much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?

NATO 44.5PPA 36.90.1, the lowest in this set91.8, the highest

A percentile among the 379 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

NATO42% of its weight is outside the S&P 500 · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
58%42%of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 98% · top ten 59% of the fund · 84 holdings filed Jun 30, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 5% in58%42%in the S&P 500outsideactive share 98% · top ten 59% of the fund
PPA28% of its weight is outside the S&P 500 · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
72%28%of its weight in S&P 500 companiesoutside the S&P 500active share 96% · top ten 54% of the fund · 63 holdings filed Sep 19, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 5% in72%28%in the S&P 500outsideactive share 96% · top ten 54% of the fund

58% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, NATO and PPA hold 58% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions NATO and PPA both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingNATOPPA
RTX Corp7.61%8.16%
Boeing Co/The7.28%6.87%
General Electric Co9.73%6.77%
Lockheed Martin Corp5.19%6.67%
Howmet Aerospace Inc4.85%3.97%
General Dynamics Corp3.63%4.99%
Northrop Grumman Corp3.37%5.04%
Honeywell Aerospace Inc3.11%3.53%
TransDigm Group Inc3.40%2.92%
L3Harris Technologies Inc2.52%3.73%
Axon Enterprise Inc1.91%2.96%
Rocket Lab Corp2.51%1.70%
Only in each
Only in NATOOnly in PPA
Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC 7.16%Parker-Hannifin Corp 3.89%
Safran SA 4.89%Elbit Systems Ltd 3.50%
BAE Systems PLC 3.38%Amphenol Corp 2.65%
Honeywell International Inc 3.15%Eaton Corp PLC 2.40%
Rheinmetall AG 2.41%Palantir Technologies Inc 1.93%
FTAI Aviation Ltd 1.27%ATI Inc 1.74%
MTU Aero Engines AG 1.03%Carpenter Technology Corp 1.38%
Thales SA 1.03%Woodward Inc 1.25%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 19, 2026.

Performance, window by window

NATO and PPA over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnvs the S&P 500vs the Nasdaq-100
NATOPPANATOPPANATOPPA
3 months−6.6%−8.8%−8.9 pts−11.0 pts−4.1 pts−6.3 pts
6 months−3.4%−5.5%−21.5 pts−23.5 pts−27.7 pts−29.7 pts
1 year+0.6%+6.0%−16.0 pts−10.6 pts−21.2 pts−15.8 pts
3 yearsnot published+98.2%not published+19.8 ptsnot published+0.1 pts
Since launch+49.9%+985.0%+15.4 pts+181.5 pts+2.3 pts−705.2 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
NATO and PPA on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
NATO
Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF
Holds 84 stocks in defense, 58% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
PPA
Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF
Holds 63 stocks in defense, 72% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
IssuerThemesInvesco
ThemeDefenseDefense
In the S&P 50058.4%71.7%
Active share vs the S&P 50097.6%96.4%
In the Nasdaq-1005.1%4.9%
Holdings8463
Top ten, share of the fund58.8%53.6%
Expense ratio0.35%0.58%
Fee for the differing part0.36%0.60%
Total return, 1 year+0.6%+6.0%
vs the S&P 500−16.0 pts−10.6 pts
vs the Nasdaq-100−21.2 pts−15.8 pts
Below its high−14.4%−13.8%
Net assets$95m$7.6bn

NATO in plain words

By weight, 58% of NATO's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 98%. The top ten holdings are 59% of the fund across 84 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 the fund returned +0.6% with distributions reinvested against +16.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 16.0 pts. It sits 14.4% below its all-time high of Mar 2, 2026.

PPA in plain words

By weight, 72% of PPA's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 96%. The top ten holdings are 54% of the fund across 63 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 19, 2026. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 the fund returned +6.0% with distributions reinvested against +16.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 10.6 pts. It sits 13.8% below its all-time high of Mar 2, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do NATO and PPA hold the same stocks?
By their latest filings, 58% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is close to holding one of them twice. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, NATO or PPA?
NATO has 58% of its weight in S&P 500 names and PPA has 72%, so NATO differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, NATO or PPA?
NATO charges 0.35% a year and PPA charges 0.58%, so NATO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

NATO against PPA, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, NATO against PPA, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/nato-vs-ppa Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources