Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
METL vs SGDJ: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, METL returned +6.9% to SGDJ's +26.2%; 4% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about METL and SGDJNet assets on Nov 4, 2026: $66m for Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF and $315m for Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF.
14% of METL's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 86% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 4, 2026.
0% of SGDJ's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 4, 2026.
Pair scorecard
SGDJ costs 0.49 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 19.3 points; SGDJ is 4.8 times larger.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | METL | SGDJ |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +6.9% | +26.2% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its all-time high | 33.0%, high on Jan 28, 2026 | 31.7%, high on Feb 27, 2026 |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Miners and metals | Gold miners |
| Against the S&P 500, 1 year | behind by 7.9 pts | |
| Its benchmark, total return, 1 year | +14.8% | |
| Against its benchmark, 1 year | behind by 7.9 pts | |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.99% | 0.50% |
| Net assets | $66m | $315m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 4% | |
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, METL and SGDJ hold 4% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Nov 4, 2026.
half
4% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Window by window
| Total return | vs its benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | METL | SGDJ | METL | SGDJ |
| 3 months | −16.2% | −6.7% | −16.1 pts vs VOO | not measured |
| 6 months | −26.0% | −14.2% | −31.0 pts vs VOO | not measured |
| 1 year | +6.9% | +26.2% | −7.9 pts vs VOO | not measured |
| 3 years | – | +232.8% | – | not measured |
| Since launchNot the same days: METL Sep 2025 · SGDJ Mar 2015 | +12.3% | +342.6% | −6.9 pts vs VOO | not measured |
– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
4% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
METL
By weight, 14% of METL's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 40% of the fund across 45 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 4, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +6.9% with distributions reinvested against +14.8% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Total Return Index, so a holder was behind by 7.9 pts. It sits 33.0% below its all-time high of Jan 28, 2026.
SGDJ
By weight, 0% of SGDJ's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 47% of the fund across 30 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 4, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +26.2% with distributions reinvested. It sits 31.7% below its all-time high of Feb 27, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Do METL and SGDJ hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 4% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, METL against SGDJ, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/metl-vs-sgdj
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). METL against SGDJ. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/metl-vs-sgdj
[METL against SGDJ (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/metl-vs-sgdj)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.