Data as of .
KAIT vs XA: which is really different?
KAIT and XA hold 0% of their weight in the same names.
ETFIQ Off-Index Score: KAIT scores higher
How much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?
A percentile among the 379 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, KAIT and XA hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in KAIT | Only in XA |
|---|---|
| TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFAC 6.16% | Palo Alto Networks Inc 12.91% |
| SK HYNIX INC 5.67% | Crowdstrike Holdings Inc 11.86% |
| SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD 4.96% | Okta Inc 6.91% |
| ASIA VITAL COMPONENTS 4.30% | Fortinet Inc 5.87% |
| ADVANTEST CORP 4.05% | Datadog Inc 5.29% |
| AURAS TECHNOLOGY CO LTD 3.71% | Rubrik Inc 4.81% |
| LAND MARK OPTOELECTRONICS 3.61% | Cloudflare Inc 4.66% |
| HANMI SEMICONDUCTOR CO LTD 3.01% | Zscaler Inc 4.16% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KAIT | XA | KAIT | XA | KAIT | XA | |
| 3 months | not published | +27.7% | not published | +25.4 pts | not published | +30.2 pts |
| Since launch | +3.8% | +59.5% | +4.5 pts | +55.1 pts | +3.1 pts | +55.6 pts |
| KAIT KraneShares Asia AI Technology ETF Holds 52 stocks in artificial intelligence, 0% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | XA Corgi AI Cybersecurity ETF Holds 26 stocks in artificial intelligence, 47% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | KraneShares | Corgi |
| Theme | Artificial intelligence | Artificial intelligence |
| In the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 47.2% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 100.0% | 98.9% |
| In the Nasdaq-100 | 0.0% | 40.1% |
| Holdings | 52 | 26 |
| Top ten, share of the fund | 40.6% | 64.6% |
| Expense ratio | not published | 0.35% |
| Fee for the differing part | not published | 0.35% |
| Total return, 1 year | +3.8% (since launch on Aug 19, 2026) | +59.5% (since launch on May 6, 2026) |
| vs the S&P 500 | +4.5 pts | +55.1 pts |
| vs the Nasdaq-100 | +3.1 pts | +55.6 pts |
| Below its high | −1.1% | −2.6% |
| Net assets | $5m | $6m |
KAIT in plain words
By weight, 0% of KAIT's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 41% of the fund across 52 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 18, 2026. Since it launched on Aug 19, 2026 the fund returned +3.8% with distributions reinvested against −0.7% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 4.5 pts.
XA in plain words
By weight, 47% of XA's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 99%. The top ten holdings are 65% of the fund across 26 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 18, 2026. Since it launched on May 6, 2026 the fund returned +59.5% with distributions reinvested against +4.3% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 55.1 pts.
Questions people ask
- Do KAIT and XA hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
- Which is more different from the S&P 500, KAIT or XA?
- KAIT has 0% of its weight in S&P 500 names and XA has 47%, so KAIT differs more from the index.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, KAIT against XA, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/kait-vs-xa Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.