Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Thematic ETFs

ISTM vs REXC: Holdings Overlap & Returns

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

ISTM and REXC hold 0% of their weight in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about ISTM and REXC

Net assets on Nov 4, 2026: $28m for iShares Strategic Metals ETF and $71m for Sprott Rare Earths Ex-China ETF.

At a glance
0.9%
ISTM in the S&P 500
0.0%
REXC in the S&P 500
+18.3%
ISTM total return, 1 year
−39.1%
REXC total return, since launch, Apr 15, 2026
ISTM · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 99% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
99% of its weight is outside the S&P 5001% of ISTM's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 99% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 3, 2026.1%99%1% of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 11% of the fund · 86 holdings as published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 0% in99% of its weight is outside the S&P 5001% of ISTM's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 99% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 3, 2026.1%99%1% of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · Nasdaq-100: 0% in

1% of ISTM's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 99% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 3, 2026.

REXC · 6 months to Nov 4, 2026 100% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
100% of its weight is outside the S&P 5000% of REXC's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 4, 2026.0%100%0% of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 75% of the fund · 41 holdings as published by its issuer for Nov 4, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 0% in100% of its weight is outside the S&P 5000% of REXC's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 4, 2026.0%100%0% of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · Nasdaq-100: 0% in

0% of REXC's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 4, 2026.

Pair scorecard

ISTM costs 0.18 points a year less; REXC is 2.5 times larger.

ISTM vs REXC: Holdings Overlap & Returns
MeasureISTMREXC
Return
Total return, 1 year+18.3%not published
Drawdown
Below its all-time high22.6%, high on Jan 29, 202646.3%, high on May 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksRare earth and critical materialsRare earth and critical materials
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.47%0.65%
Net assets$28m$71m
Holdings
Holdings in common0%

Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, ISTM and REXC hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Nov 3, 2026 and Nov 4, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first ISTM REXC
Only in one fund ↓
Only in ISTM
CRH AMERICA FINANCE INC 144A 1.89%
DTE ELECTRIC CO 1.13%
COLUMBIA FUNDING COMPANY LLC 144A 1.09%
GLENCOVE FUNDING LLC 144A 1.09%
OMERS FINANCE TRUST 144A 1.09%
SHINHAN BANK NEW YORK 144A 1.06%
BUNGE LTD FINANCE CORP 144A 0.98%
ASB BANK LIMITED 144A 0.97%
Only in REXC
Lynas Rare Earths Ltd. 21.26%
MP Materials Corp. 18.95%
Iluka Resources Ltd. 5.57%
Neo Performance Materials Inc. 5.36%
Sunrise Energy Metals Ltd. 4.57%
USA Rare Earth Inc. 4.34%
Critical Metals Corp. 4.27%
Arafura Rare Earths Ltd. 3.96%
Check overlap with more funds →

Window by window

Window by window: ISTM vs REXC: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Total return
WindowISTMREXC
3 months−8.4%−26.7%
6 months−12.6%−46.3%
1 year+18.3%–
3 years+68.3%–
Since launchNot the same days: ISTM Sep 2023 · REXC Apr 2026+66.9%−39.1%

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

ISTM iShares Strategic Metals ETF · Holds 86 stocks in rare earth and critical materials, 1% of its weight in S&P 500 companies REXC Sprott Rare Earths Ex-China ETF · Holds 41 stocks in rare earth and critical materials, 0% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
Theme Rare earth and critical materials Rare earth and critical materials
In the S&P 500 0.9% 0.0%
Active share vs the S&P 500 100.0% 100.0%
In the Nasdaq-100 0.0% 0.0%
Holdings 86 41
Top ten, share of the fund 11.2% 74.8%
Expense ratio 0.47% 0.65%
Fee for the differing part 0.47% 0.65%
Total return, 1 year +18.3% −39.1% (since launch, Apr 15, 2026)
vs its benchmark not measured not measured
Below its high −22.6% −46.3%
Net assets $28m $71m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Alert

ISTM flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
ISTM

By weight, 1% of ISTM's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 11% of the fund across 86 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +18.3% with distributions reinvested. It sits 22.6% below its all-time high of Jan 29, 2026.

REXC

By weight, 0% of REXC's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 75% of the fund across 41 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 4, 2026. Since it first traded on Apr 15, 2026 the fund returned −39.1% with distributions reinvested. It sits 46.3% below its all-time high of May 6, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do ISTM and REXC hold the same stocks?
By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, ISTM or REXC?
ISTM has 1% of its weight in S&P 500 names and REXC has 0%, so ISTM differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, ISTM or REXC?
ISTM charges 0.47% a year and REXC charges 0.65%, so ISTM is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, ISTM against REXC, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/istm-vs-rexc

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.