Data as of .
INQQ vs ONLN: which is really different?
INQQ and ONLN hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and ONLN returned more over the year.
ETFIQ Off-Index Score: INQQ scores higher
How much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?
A percentile among the 379 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, INQQ and ONLN hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in INQQ | Only in ONLN |
|---|---|
| RELIANCE INDUSTRIES LIMITED 7.83% | AMAZON.COM INC 24.79% |
| BAJAJ FINANCE LIMITED 7.63% | ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING-SP ADR 8.72% |
| BILLIONBRAINS GARAGE VENTURES LIMITED 7.44% | EBAY INC 8.69% |
| Eternal Ltd 6.79% | CARVANA CO 4.64% |
| Lenskart Solutions Ltd 6.67% | PDD HOLDINGS INC 4.50% |
| PB Fintech Ltd 6.53% | MERCADOLIBRE INC 3.90% |
| JIO FINANCIAL SERVICES LIMITED 5.89% | WILLIAMS-SONOMA INC 3.70% |
| FSN E-COMMERCE VENTURES LIMITED 5.01% | WAYFAIR INC- CLASS A 3.49% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| INQQ | ONLN | INQQ | ONLN | INQQ | ONLN | |
| 3 months | +7.8% | +0.9% | +5.5 pts | −1.4 pts | +10.3 pts | +3.4 pts |
| 6 months | +16.4% | +8.7% | −1.6 pts | −9.3 pts | −7.8 pts | −15.5 pts |
| 1 year | −13.8% | −8.8% | −30.4 pts | −25.3 pts | −35.6 pts | −30.5 pts |
| 3 years | +11.5% | +78.7% | −66.9 pts | +0.3 pts | −86.7 pts | −19.4 pts |
| Since launch | −11.7% | +42.6% | −92.9 pts | −166.3 pts | −121.4 pts | −281.6 pts |
| INQQ INQQ The India Internet ETF Holds 28 stocks in internet and e-commerce, 0% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | ONLN ProShares Online Retail ETF Holds 21 stocks in internet and e-commerce, 42% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | EMQQ Global | ProShares |
| Theme | Internet and e-commerce | Internet and e-commerce |
| In the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 41.8% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 100.0% | 96.2% |
| In the Nasdaq-100 | 0.0% | 33.2% |
| Holdings | 28 | 21 |
| Top ten, share of the fund | 62.3% | 69.1% |
| Expense ratio | 0.86% | 0.58% |
| Fee for the differing part | 0.86% | 0.60% |
| Total return, 1 year | −13.8% | −8.8% |
| vs the S&P 500 | −30.4 pts | −25.3 pts |
| vs the Nasdaq-100 | −35.6 pts | −30.5 pts |
| Below its high | −18.2% | −38.9% |
| Net assets | $44m | $59m |
INQQ in plain words
By weight, 0% of INQQ's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 62% of the fund across 28 positions, as filed for May 31, 2026. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 the fund returned −13.8% with distributions reinvested against +16.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 30.4 pts. It sits 18.2% below its all-time high of Dec 11, 2024.
ONLN in plain words
By weight, 42% of ONLN's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 96%. The top ten holdings are 69% of the fund across 21 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 18, 2026. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 the fund returned −8.8% with distributions reinvested against +16.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 25.3 pts. It sits 38.9% below its all-time high of Feb 12, 2021.
Questions people ask
- Do INQQ and ONLN hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
- Which is more different from the S&P 500, INQQ or ONLN?
- INQQ has 0% of its weight in S&P 500 names and ONLN has 42%, so INQQ differs more from the index.
- Which is cheaper, INQQ or ONLN?
- INQQ charges 0.86% a year and ONLN charges 0.58%, so ONLN is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, INQQ against ONLN, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/inqq-vs-onln Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.