Do IGV and QTUM hold the same stocks?

By their latest filings, 8% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.

Which is more different from the S&P 500, IGV or QTUM?

IGV has 80% of its weight in S&P 500 names and QTUM has 38%, so IGV differs more from the index.

Which is cheaper, IGV or QTUM?

IGV charges 0.38% a year and QTUM charges 0.40%, so IGV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

Thematic ETFs

IGV vs QTUM: Holdings Overlap & Returns

Share on X Download as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IGV returned −4.1% to QTUM's +28.9%; 8% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about IGV and QTUM

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $14.4bn for iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF and $5.4bn for Defiance Quantum ETF.

IGV on its own →QTUM on its own →

At a glance

80.3%

IGV in the S&P 500

37.5%

QTUM in the S&P 500

−4.1%

IGV total return, 1 year

+28.9%

QTUM total return, 1 year

IGV · 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 20% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

80% of IGV's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 20% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 27, 2026.

QTUM · 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 63% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

38% of QTUM's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 63% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 28, 2026.

Pair scorecard

IGV costs 0.02 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 33.0 points; IGV is 2.7 times larger.

IGV vs QTUM: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Measure	IGV	QTUM
Return
Measure	IGV	QTUM
Total return, 1 year	−4.1%	+28.9%
Drawdown
Measure	IGV	QTUM
Below its all-time high		14.3%, high on Jun 2, 2026
Benchmark
Measure	IGV	QTUM
What it tracks	Cloud and software	Quantum computing
Cost and size
Measure	IGV	QTUM
Expense ratio	0.38%	0.40%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026	$14.4bn	$5.4bn
Holdings
Measure	IGV	QTUM
Holdings in common	8%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund	61%	18%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026 and Oct 28, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Sep 14, 2018 to Oct 23, 2026 · 423 weekly returns

IGV QTUM

Return

Total return edge QTUM +171.2% +489.3%

Annualized edge QTUM +13.0% +24.4%

Price return edge QTUM +169.0% +450.1%

Risk

Volatility edge QTUM (slight) 27.6% 26.3%

Max drawdown edge QTUM −45.4% −38.1%

Risk-adjusted

Sharpe edge QTUM 0.48 0.86

Sortino edge QTUM 0.72 1.28

Calmar edge QTUM 0.29 0.64

Reading

QTUM returned more: +489.3% to +171.2%. QTUM swung slightly less: 26.3% to 27.6%. QTUM fell less at its worst: −38.1% to −45.4%.

Full scorecard

9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓

Risk and return: IGV vs QTUM: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Measure	IGV	QTUM	Edge	How it is measured
Return
Total return	+171.2%	+489.3%	QTUM	Price change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized	+13.0%	+24.4%	QTUM	Total return as a yearly rate.
Price return	+169.0%	+450.1%	QTUM	Price change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility	27.6%	26.3%	QTUM (slight)	Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation	18.5%	17.6%	QTUM (slight)	Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown	−45.4%	−38.1%	QTUM	Deepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe	0.48	0.86	QTUM	Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino	0.72	1.28	QTUM	Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Calmar	0.29	0.64	QTUM	Annualized return divided by the max drawdown.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 423 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

By the books each fund has filed, IGV and QTUM hold 8% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026 and Oct 28, 2026.

50%

0 half 100%

half

8% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first IGV QTUM

PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES CLASS A 9.10% 1.84%

MICROSOFT 8.39% 1.63%

SYNOPSYS 3.00% 1.27%

CADENCE DESIGN SYSTEMS 3.12% 1.08%

ORACLE 6.27% 0.88%

NUTANIX CLASS A 0.65% 1.78%

ELASTIC 0.32% 2.14%

D WAVE QUANTUM 0.15% 0.62%

TERADATA 0.11% 1.27%

Only in one fund ↓

Only in IGV

PALO ALTO NETWORKS 9.30%

CROWDSTRIKE HOLDINGS CLASS A 8.55%

SERVICENOW 4.85%

SALESFORCE 4.05%

FORTINET 3.76%

ADOBE INC 3.26%

DATADOG INC CLASS A 3.10%

INTUIT 2.96%

Only in QTUM

Global Unichip Corp 2.43%

Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd 1.86%

Cloudflare Inc 1.77%

Snowflake Inc 1.73%

Arqit Quantum Inc 1.72%

Fujitsu Ltd 1.64%

Nec Corp 1.63%

Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co 1.62%

Check overlap with more funds →

Window by window

Window by window: IGV vs QTUM: Holdings Overlap & Returns
	Total return
Window	IGV	QTUM
3 months	+21.2%	+9.1%
6 months	+32.5%	+11.2%
1 year	−4.1%	+28.9%
3 years	+70.0%	+229.7%
Since launchNot the same days: IGV Jul 2001 · QTUM Sep 2018	+1,015.0%	+522.8%

Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF · Holds 108 stocks in cloud and software, 80% of its weight in S&P 500 companies QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF · Holds 85 stocks in quantum computing, 38% of its weight in S&P 500 companies

Issuer iShares Defiance

Theme Cloud and software Quantum computing

In the S&P 500 80.3% 37.5%

Active share vs the S&P 500 92.4% 82.2%

In the Nasdaq-100 65.1% 28.0%

Holdings 108 85

Top ten, share of the fund 60.7% 18.5%

Expense ratio 0.38% 0.40%

Fee for the differing part 0.41% 0.49%

Total return, 1 year −4.1% +28.9%

vs its benchmark not measured not measured

Below its high −5.0% −14.3%

Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $14.4bn $5.4bn

As of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

8% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-F4449CF3A8

IGV and QTUM are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

Theme. IGV covers Cloud and software and QTUM covers Quantum computing.
Concentration. The top ten holdings are 60.7% of IGV and 18.5% of QTUM, a gap of 42.2 points.
What each follows. IGV follows Cloud and software and QTUM follows Quantum computing.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

About each fund

IGV

By weight, 80% of IGV's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 92%. The top ten holdings are 61% of the fund across 108 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned −4.1% with distributions reinvested.

QTUM

By weight, 38% of QTUM's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 82%. The top ten holdings are 18% of the fund across 85 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 28, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned +28.9% with distributions reinvested. It sits 14.3% below its all-time high of Jun 2, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do IGV and QTUM hold the same stocks?: By their latest filings, 8% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, IGV or QTUM?: IGV has 80% of its weight in S&P 500 names and QTUM has 38%, so IGV differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, IGV or QTUM?: IGV charges 0.38% a year and QTUM charges 0.40%, so IGV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

IGV vs ARKK IGV vs SIL IGV vs KWEB IGV vs XT QTUM vs QTUP QTUM vs CQTM QTUM vs AIRR QTUM vs SHLD

Where to next

All thematic ETFs ranked by the S&P 500 Difference Score →How the scores are computed →IGV on its own →QTUM on its own →IGV dividend history →IGV holdings →QTUM dividend history →QTUM holdings →Method →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

IGV filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

IGV prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

iShares page for IGV ↗

QTUM filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

QTUM prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

Defiance page for QTUM ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IGV against QTUM, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/igv-vs-qtum

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.