Data as of .
IFRA vs SHLD: which is really different?
IFRA holds 71.4% of its weight in S&P 500 companies and SHLD 40.5%.
ETFIQ Off-Index Score: SHLD scores higher
How much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?
A percentile among the 371 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, IFRA and SHLD hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in IFRA | Only in SHLD |
|---|---|
| UNION PACIFIC 4.43% | PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC-A 10.28% |
| NEXTERA ENERGY 4.05% | RTX CORPORATION 9.40% |
| CATERPILLAR INC 3.76% | GENERAL DYNAMICS CORP 8.73% |
| QUANTA SERVICES INC 3.52% | LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP 8.26% |
| CSX 3.48% | NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORP 7.86% |
| SOUTHERN 2.91% | BAE SYSTEMS PLC 4.54% |
| CONSTELLATION ENERGY CORP 2.85% | HANWHA AEROSPACE CO LTD 4.04% |
| NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORP 2.78% | RHEINMETALL AG 3.82% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026 and Sep 11, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IFRA | SHLD | IFRA | SHLD | IFRA | SHLD | |
| 3 months | −5.6% | −2.9% | −8.9 pts | −6.2 pts | −4.8 pts | −2.1 pts |
| 6 months | +2.3% | −18.1% | −13.7 pts | −34.1 pts | −18.4 pts | −38.8 pts |
| 1 year | +13.5% | −4.8% | −4.0 pts | −22.4 pts | −9.5 pts | −27.8 pts |
| 3 years | +61.6% | not published | −16.3 pts | not published | −33.5 pts | not published |
| Since launch | +169.3% | +153.8% | −57.4 pts | +76.2 pts | −200.6 pts | +59.5 pts |
| IFRA iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF Holds 164 stocks in infrastructure, 71% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | SHLD Global X Defense Tech ETF Holds 52 stocks in defense, 40% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | iShares | Global X |
| Theme | Infrastructure | Defense |
| In the S&P 500 | 71.4% | 40.5% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 95.7% | 99.1% |
| In the Nasdaq-100 | 11.0% | 0.0% |
| Holdings | 164 | 52 |
| Top ten, share of the fund | 33.1% | 64.3% |
| Expense ratio | 0.30% | 0.50% |
| Fee for the differing part | 0.31% | 0.50% |
| Total return, 1 year | +13.5% | −4.8% |
| vs the S&P 500 | −4.0 pts | −22.4 pts |
| vs the Nasdaq-100 | −9.5 pts | −27.8 pts |
| Below its high | −8.9% | −20.6% |
IFRA in plain words
By weight, 71% of IFRA's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 96%. The top ten holdings are 33% of the fund across 164 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 10, 2026. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 the fund returned +13.5% with distributions reinvested against +17.5% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 4.0 pts. It sits 8.9% below its all-time high of Jun 25, 2026.
SHLD in plain words
By weight, 40% of SHLD's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 99%. The top ten holdings are 64% of the fund across 52 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 11, 2026. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 the fund returned −4.8% with distributions reinvested against +17.5% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 22.4 pts. It sits 20.6% below its all-time high of Mar 9, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which is more different from the S&P 500, IFRA or SHLD?
- IFRA has 71% of its weight in S&P 500 names and SHLD has 40%, so SHLD differs more from the index.
- Which is cheaper, IFRA or SHLD?
- IFRA charges 0.30% a year and SHLD charges 0.50%, so IFRA is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, IFRA against SHLD, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/ifra-vs-shld Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.