Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Thematic ETFs

IFRA vs QTUM: Holdings Overlap & Returns

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IFRA returned +9.4% to QTUM's +28.9%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about IFRA and QTUM

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $4.0bn for iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF and $5.4bn for Defiance Quantum ETF.

At a glance
72.1%
IFRA in the S&P 500
37.5%
QTUM in the S&P 500
+9.4%
IFRA total return, 1 year
+28.9%
QTUM total return, 1 year
IFRA · 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 28% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
28% of its weight is outside the S&P 50072% of IFRA's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 28% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 27, 2026.72%28%of its weight in S&P 500 companiesoutside the S&P 500active share 96% · top ten 33% of the fund · 164 holdings as published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 11% in28% of its weight is outside the S&P 50072% of IFRA's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 28% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 27, 2026.72%28%in the S&P 500outsideactive share 96% · Nasdaq-100: 11% in

72% of IFRA's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 28% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 27, 2026.

QTUM · 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 63% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
63% of its weight is outside the S&P 50038% of QTUM's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 63% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 28, 2026.38%63%of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 82% · top ten 19% of the fund · 85 holdings as published by its issuer for Oct 28, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 28% in63% of its weight is outside the S&P 50038% of QTUM's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 63% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 28, 2026.38%63%in the S&P 500outside the S&P 500active share 82% · Nasdaq-100: 28% in

38% of QTUM's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 63% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 28, 2026.

Pair scorecard

IFRA costs 0.10 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 19.5 points; QTUM is 1.4 times larger.

IFRA vs QTUM: Holdings Overlap & Returns
MeasureIFRAQTUM
Return
Total return, 1 year+9.4%+28.9%
Drawdown
Below its all-time high9.6%, high on Jun 25, 202614.3%, high on Jun 2, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksInfrastructureQuantum computing
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.30%0.40%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$4.0bn$5.4bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund33%18%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026 and Oct 28, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Sep 14, 2018 to Oct 23, 2026 · 423 weekly returns
IFRA QTUM
Return
Total return edge QTUM +141.4% +489.3%
Annualized edge QTUM +11.4% +24.4%
Price return edge QTUM +103.5% +450.1%
Risk
Volatility edge IFRA 22.2% 26.3%
Max drawdown edge QTUM (slight) −39.2% −38.1%
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge QTUM 0.47 0.86
Sortino edge QTUM 0.68 1.28
Calmar edge QTUM 0.29 0.64
Reading

QTUM returned more: +489.3% to +141.4%. IFRA swung less: 22.2% to 26.3%. QTUM fell slightly less at its worst: −38.1% to −39.2%.

Full scorecard

9 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: IFRA vs QTUM: Holdings Overlap & Returns
MeasureIFRAQTUMEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+141.4%+489.3%QTUMPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+11.4%+24.4%QTUMTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+103.5%+450.1%QTUMPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility22.2%26.3%IFRASpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation15.5%17.6%IFRALike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−39.2%−38.1%QTUM (slight)Deepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.470.86QTUMReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.681.28QTUMReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Calmar0.290.64QTUMAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 423 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, IFRA and QTUM hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026 and Oct 28, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first IFRA QTUM
Only in one fund ↓
Only in IFRA
UNION PACIFIC 4.24%
NEXTERA ENERGY 4.04%
CSX 3.81%
CATERPILLAR INC 3.59%
QUANTA SERVICES INC 3.39%
SOUTHERN 3.09%
NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORP 3.00%
UNITED RENTALS 2.84%
Only in QTUM
Global Unichip Corp 2.43%
Elastic Nv 2.14%
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd 1.86%
Palantir Technologies Inc 1.84%
Nutanix Inc 1.78%
Cloudflare Inc 1.77%
Snowflake Inc 1.73%
Arqit Quantum Inc 1.72%
Check overlap with more funds →

Window by window

Window by window: IFRA vs QTUM: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Total return
WindowIFRAQTUM
3 months−3.4%+9.1%
6 months−3.8%+11.2%
1 year+9.4%+28.9%
3 years+76.3%+229.7%
Since launchNot the same days: IFRA Apr 2018 · QTUM Sep 2018+167.2%+522.8%

Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

IFRA iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF · Holds 164 stocks in infrastructure, 72% of its weight in S&P 500 companies QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF · Holds 85 stocks in quantum computing, 38% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
Theme Infrastructure Quantum computing
In the S&P 500 72.1% 37.5%
Active share vs the S&P 500 95.7% 82.2%
In the Nasdaq-100 11.2% 28.0%
Holdings 164 85
Top ten, share of the fund 33.4% 18.5%
Expense ratio 0.30% 0.40%
Fee for the differing part 0.31% 0.49%
Total return, 1 year +9.4% +28.9%
vs its benchmark not measured not measured
Below its high −9.6% −14.3%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $4.0bn $5.4bn

As of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-0089F3FE50

IFRA and QTUM are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. Theme. IFRA covers Infrastructure and QTUM covers Quantum computing.
  2. Concentration. The top ten holdings are 33.4% of IFRA and 18.5% of QTUM, a gap of 14.9 points.
  3. What each follows. IFRA follows Infrastructure and QTUM follows Quantum computing.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

IFRA flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
IFRA

By weight, 72% of IFRA's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 96%. The top ten holdings are 33% of the fund across 164 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned +9.4% with distributions reinvested. It sits 9.6% below its all-time high of Jun 25, 2026.

QTUM

By weight, 38% of QTUM's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 82%. The top ten holdings are 18% of the fund across 85 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 28, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned +28.9% with distributions reinvested. It sits 14.3% below its all-time high of Jun 2, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do IFRA and QTUM hold the same stocks?
By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, IFRA or QTUM?
IFRA has 72% of its weight in S&P 500 names and QTUM has 38%, so IFRA differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, IFRA or QTUM?
IFRA charges 0.30% a year and QTUM charges 0.40%, so IFRA is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IFRA against QTUM, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/ifra-vs-qtum

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.