Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Thematic ETFs

IDEF vs IGV: Holdings Overlap & Returns

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IDEF returned −5.7% to IGV's −4.1%; 9% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about IDEF and IGV

Net assets: $3.7bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares Defense Industrials and Tech Active ETF, and $14.4bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF.

At a glance
42.5%
IDEF in the S&P 500
80.3%
IGV in the S&P 500
−5.7%
IDEF total return, 1 year
−4.1%
IGV total return, 1 year
IDEF · 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 58% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
58% of its weight is outside the S&P 50043% of IDEF's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 58% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 27, 2026.43%58%of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 92% · top ten 37% of the fund · 155 holdings as published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 11% in58% of its weight is outside the S&P 50043% of IDEF's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 58% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 27, 2026.43%58%in the S&P 500outside the S&P 500active share 92% · Nasdaq-100: 11% in

43% of IDEF's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 58% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 27, 2026.

IGV · 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 20% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
20% of its weight is outside the S&P 50080% of IGV's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 20% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 27, 2026.80%20%of its weight in S&P 500 companiesoutside the S&P 500active share 92% · top ten 61% of the fund · 108 holdings as published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 65% in20% of its weight is outside the S&P 50080% of IGV's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 20% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 27, 2026.80%20%in the S&P 50020% of its weight outside the S&P 500active share 92% · Nasdaq-100: 65% in

80% of IGV's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 20% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 27, 2026.

Pair scorecard

IGV costs 0.17 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 1.6 points; IGV is 3.9 times larger.

IDEF vs IGV: Holdings Overlap & Returns
MeasureIDEFIGV
Return
Total return, 1 year−5.7%−4.1%
Drawdown
Below its all-time high17.0%, high on Mar 2, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksDefenseCloud and software
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.55%0.38%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$3.7bn$14.4bn
Holdings
Holdings in common9%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

May 30, 2025 to Oct 23, 2026 · 73 weekly returns
IDEF IGV
Return
Total return edge IDEF +14.9% +6.7%
Annualized edge IDEF +10.4% +4.7%
Price return edge IDEF +14.5% +6.7%
Risk
Volatility edge IDEF 22.4% 31.6%
Max drawdown edge IDEF −17.1% −36.3%
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge IDEF 0.38 0.18
Sortino edge IDEF 0.58 0.27
Calmar edge IDEF 0.61 0.13
Reading

IDEF returned more: +14.9% to +6.7%. IDEF swung less: 22.4% to 31.6%. IDEF fell less at its worst: −17.1% to −36.3%.

Full scorecard

9 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: IDEF vs IGV: Holdings Overlap & Returns
MeasureIDEFIGVEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+14.9%+6.7%IDEFPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+10.4%+4.7%IDEFTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+14.5%+6.7%IDEFPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility22.4%31.6%IDEFSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation14.7%21.2%IDEFLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−17.1%−36.3%IDEFDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.380.18IDEFReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.580.27IDEFReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Calmar0.610.13IDEFAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 73 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

9%

By the books each fund has filed, IDEF and IGV hold 9% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

9% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first IDEF IGV
PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES CLASS A 3.02% 9.10%
PALO ALTO NETWORKS 1.46% 9.30%
MICROSOFT 1.34% 8.39%
CROWDSTRIKE HOLDINGS CLASS A 1.30% 8.55%
FORTINET 0.85% 3.76%
ZSCALER 0.52% 0.90%
SERVICENOW 0.09% 4.85%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in IDEF
RTX 7.05%
LOCKHEED MARTIN 5.27%
GENERAL DYNAMICS CORP 4.15%
NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORP 3.92%
BOEING 3.44%
ROLLS-ROYCE HOLDINGS PLC 3.06%
SPACE EXPLORATION TECHNOLOGIES COR 2.93%
AIRBUS GROUP 2.34%
Only in IGV
ORACLE 6.27%
SALESFORCE 4.05%
ADOBE INC 3.26%
CADENCE DESIGN SYSTEMS 3.12%
DATADOG INC CLASS A 3.10%
SYNOPSYS 3.00%
INTUIT 2.96%
APPLOVIN CLASS A 2.35%
Check overlap with more funds →

Window by window

Window by window: IDEF vs IGV: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Total return
WindowIDEFIGV
3 months−3.0%+21.2%
6 months−5.8%+32.5%
1 year−5.7%−4.1%
3 years–+70.0%
Since launchNot the same days: IDEF May 2025 · IGV Jul 2001+22.1%+1,015.0%

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

IDEF iShares Defense Industrials and Tech Active ETF · Holds 155 stocks in defense, 42% of its weight in S&P 500 companies IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF · Holds 108 stocks in cloud and software, 80% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
Theme Defense Cloud and software
In the S&P 500 42.5% 80.3%
Active share vs the S&P 500 92.2% 92.4%
In the Nasdaq-100 10.7% 65.1%
Holdings 155 108
Top ten, share of the fund 37.3% 60.7%
Expense ratio 0.55% 0.38%
Fee for the differing part 0.60% 0.41%
Total return, 1 year −5.7% −4.1%
vs its benchmark not measured not measured
Below its high −17.0% −5.0%
Net assets, IDEF as of Oct 28, 2026 and IGV as of Oct 27, 2026 $3.7bn $14.4bn

As of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

9% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-1DC97C88E6

IDEF and IGV are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. Theme. IDEF covers Defense and IGV covers Cloud and software.
  2. Concentration. The top ten holdings are 37.3% of IDEF and 60.7% of IGV, a gap of 23.4 points.
  3. What each follows. IDEF follows Defense and IGV follows Cloud and software.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

IDEF and IGV flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
IDEF

By weight, 42% of IDEF's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 92%. The top ten holdings are 37% of the fund across 155 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned −5.7% with distributions reinvested. It sits 17.0% below its all-time high of Mar 2, 2026.

IGV

By weight, 80% of IGV's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 92%. The top ten holdings are 61% of the fund across 108 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned −4.1% with distributions reinvested.

Questions people ask

Do IDEF and IGV hold the same stocks?
By their latest filings, 9% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, IDEF or IGV?
IDEF has 42% of its weight in S&P 500 names and IGV has 80%, so IGV differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, IDEF or IGV?
IDEF charges 0.55% a year and IGV charges 0.38%, so IGV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IDEF against IGV, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/idef-vs-igv

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.