Data as of .
GBUG vs REMX: which is really different?
GBUG and REMX hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and GBUG returned more over the year.
ETFIQ Off-Index Score: REMX scores higher
How much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?
A percentile among the 379 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, GBUG and REMX hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in GBUG | Only in REMX |
|---|---|
| DPM Metals Inc. 5.29% | Sociedad Quimica Y Minera De Chile Sa 7.93% |
| G Mining Ventures Corp. 4.94% | Albemarle Corp 7.78% |
| Discovery Mining Ltd. 4.55% | Pilbara Minerals Ltd 6.28% |
| IAMGOLD Corp. 4.15% | Mp Materials Corp 6.25% |
| Eldorado Gold Corp. 4.00% | Lynas Rare Earths Ltd 5.96% |
| Montage Gold Corp. 4.00% | China Northern Rare Earth Group High-Te 5.76% |
| Coeur Mining Inc. 3.82% | Xiamen Tungsten Co Ltd 4.95% |
| Wesdome Gold Mines Ltd. 3.81% | Jinduicheng Molybdenum Co Ltd 4.74% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GBUG | REMX | GBUG | REMX | GBUG | REMX | |
| 3 months | +19.9% | −27.7% | +17.6 pts | −30.0 pts | +22.4 pts | −25.2 pts |
| 6 months | +26.4% | −12.7% | +8.4 pts | −30.7 pts | +2.2 pts | −36.9 pts |
| 1 year | +50.5% | +14.7% | +33.9 pts | −1.9 pts | +28.7 pts | −7.1 pts |
| 3 years | not published | +3.6% | not published | −74.8 pts | not published | −94.6 pts |
| Since launch | +150.3% | −53.7% | +123.0 pts | −806.3 pts | +115.0 pts | −1534.3 pts |
| GBUG Sprott Active Gold & Silver Miners ETF Holds 44 stocks in gold miners, 3% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | REMX VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF Holds 32 stocks in rare earth and critical materials, 8% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Sprott | VanEck |
| Theme | Gold miners | Rare earth and critical materials |
| In the S&P 500 | 3.3% | 7.6% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 99.8% | 100.0% |
| In the Nasdaq-100 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Holdings | 44 | 32 |
| Top ten, share of the fund | 41.2% | 61.8% |
| Expense ratio | 0.90% | 0.53% |
| Fee for the differing part | 0.90% | 0.53% |
| Total return, 1 year | +50.5% | +14.7% |
| vs the S&P 500 | +33.9 pts | −1.9 pts |
| vs the Nasdaq-100 | +28.7 pts | −7.1 pts |
| Below its high | −14.2% | −68.3% |
| Net assets | $192m | $2.0bn |
GBUG in plain words
By weight, 3% of GBUG's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 41% of the fund across 44 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 18, 2026. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 the fund returned +50.5% with distributions reinvested against +16.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 33.9 pts. It sits 14.2% below its all-time high of Feb 27, 2026.
REMX in plain words
By weight, 8% of REMX's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 62% of the fund across 32 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 18, 2026. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 the fund returned +14.7% with distributions reinvested against +16.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 1.9 pts. It sits 68.3% below its all-time high of Apr 11, 2011.
Questions people ask
- Do GBUG and REMX hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
- Which is more different from the S&P 500, GBUG or REMX?
- GBUG has 3% of its weight in S&P 500 names and REMX has 8%, so REMX differs more from the index.
- Which is cheaper, GBUG or REMX?
- GBUG charges 0.90% a year and REMX charges 0.53%, so REMX is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, GBUG against REMX, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/gbug-vs-remx Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.