Data as of .
FITE vs INVN: which is really different?
FITE and INVN hold 2% of their weight in the same names, and FITE returned more over the year.
ETFIQ Off-Index Score: INVN scores higher
How much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?
A percentile among the 379 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
2% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, FITE and INVN hold 2% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | FITE | INVN |
|---|---|---|
| ZSCALER INC | 2.05% | 2.21% |
| Only in FITE | Only in INVN |
|---|---|
| RAPID7 INC 2.23% | ROBLOX CORP 2.56% |
| OKTA INC 2.14% | ZEBRA TECHNOLOGIES CORP 2.38% |
| QUALYS INC 2.09% | EXPEDIA GROUP INC 2.29% |
| SENTINELONE INC CLASS A 2.03% | MAPLEBEAR INC 2.25% |
| CLOUDFLARE INC CLASS A 1.97% | BLOCK INC 2.23% |
| CROWDSTRIKE HOLDINGS INC A 1.97% | BILL HOLDINGS INC 2.18% |
| RUBRIK INC A 1.96% | BIOGEN INC 2.18% |
| VARONIS SYSTEMS INC 1.88% | CCC INTELLIGENT SOLUTIONS HOLDINGS INC 2.15% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 17, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FITE | INVN | FITE | INVN | FITE | INVN | |
| 3 months | +2.7% | +24.7% | +0.5 pts | +22.4 pts | +5.2 pts | +27.2 pts |
| 6 months | +25.9% | +37.7% | +7.9 pts | +19.6 pts | +1.7 pts | +13.4 pts |
| 1 year | +30.7% | +20.7% | +14.1 pts | +4.2 pts | +8.9 pts | −1.1 pts |
| 3 years | +130.9% | not published | +52.5 pts | not published | +32.8 pts | not published |
| Since launch | +285.5% | +29.2% | +59.9 pts | −2.8 pts | −101.9 pts | −11.9 pts |
| FITE State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P Kensho Future Security ETF Holds 80 stocks in broad innovation and megatrends, 27% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | INVN Alger Russell Innovation ETF Holds 50 stocks in broad innovation and megatrends, 32% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | State Street | Alger |
| Theme | Broad innovation and megatrends | Broad innovation and megatrends |
| In the S&P 500 | 27.1% | 32.5% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 95.3% | 98.5% |
| In the Nasdaq-100 | 11.2% | 9.8% |
| Holdings | 80 | 50 |
| Top ten, share of the fund | 20.2% | 22.6% |
| Expense ratio | 0.45% | 0.55% |
| Fee for the differing part | 0.47% | 0.56% |
| Total return, 1 year | +30.7% | +20.7% |
| vs the S&P 500 | +14.1 pts | +4.2 pts |
| vs the Nasdaq-100 | +8.9 pts | −1.1 pts |
| Below its high | −8.2% | −5.6% |
| Net assets | $151m | $10m |
FITE in plain words
By weight, 27% of FITE's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 95%. The top ten holdings are 20% of the fund across 80 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 17, 2026. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 the fund returned +30.7% with distributions reinvested against +16.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 14.1 pts. It sits 8.2% below its all-time high of Aug 13, 2026.
INVN in plain words
By weight, 32% of INVN's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 98%. The top ten holdings are 23% of the fund across 50 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 the fund returned +20.7% with distributions reinvested against +16.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 4.2 pts. It sits 5.6% below its all-time high of Sep 3, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Do FITE and INVN hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 2% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
- Which is more different from the S&P 500, FITE or INVN?
- FITE has 27% of its weight in S&P 500 names and INVN has 32%, so INVN differs more from the index.
- Which is cheaper, FITE or INVN?
- FITE charges 0.45% a year and INVN charges 0.55%, so FITE is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, FITE against INVN, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/fite-vs-invn Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.