Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
EPAI vs XAIX: Holdings Overlap & Returns
EPAI and XAIX hold 0% of their weight in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about EPAI and XAIXNet assets: $5.0m on Nov 3, 2026 for Harbor AI Inflection Strategy ETF, and $147m on Nov 2, 2026 for Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence and Big Data ETF.
59% of EPAI's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 41% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jul 31, 2026.
79% of XAIX's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 21% is outside the index. Holdings as of Aug 31, 2026.
Pair scorecard
XAIX costs 0.53 points a year less; XAIX is far larger, $150m against $5.0m.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | EPAI | XAIX |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | not published | +25.0% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its all-time high | 25.1%, high on Jun 30, 2026 | 11.3%, high on Jun 2, 2026 |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Artificial intelligence | Artificial intelligence |
| Its benchmark, total return, 1 year | +15.0% | |
| Against its benchmark, 1 year | ahead by 10.0 pts | |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.88% | 0.35% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 30, 2026 | $5.0m | $150m |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 96% | 66% |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
How different its holdings are from the S&P 500, ranked against 114 thematic ETFs with at least half their money in S&P 500 companies. 100 is best. How it is computed
Weight not shared with the S&P 500 only; it says nothing about returns, fees or whether the theme pays off. All thematic ETFs ranked by it →
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, EPAI and XAIX hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Window by window
| Total return | vs its benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | EPAI | XAIX | EPAI | XAIX |
| 3 months | −13.5% | −3.6% | not measured | −2.3 pts vs ACWI |
| 6 months | −17.3% | +5.4% | not measured | +2.8 pts vs ACWI |
| 1 year | – | +25.0% | – | +10.0 pts vs ACWI |
| Since launchNot the same days: EPAI Dec 2025 · XAIX Aug 2024 | +20.3% | +87.7% | not measured | +39.2 pts vs ACWI |
– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
EPAI
By weight, 59% of EPAI's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 96%. The top ten holdings are 37% of the fund across 37 positions, as filed for Jul 31, 2026. Since it first traded on Dec 18, 2025 the fund returned +20.3% with distributions reinvested. It sits 25.1% below its all-time high of Jun 30, 2026.
XAIX
By weight, 79% of XAIX's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 66%. The top ten holdings are 44% of the fund across 101 positions, as filed for Aug 31, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +25.0% with distributions reinvested against +15.0% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI Index, so a holder was ahead by 10.0 pts. It sits 11.3% below its all-time high of Jun 2, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Do EPAI and XAIX hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, EPAI against XAIX, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/epai-vs-xaix
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). EPAI against XAIX. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/epai-vs-xaix
[EPAI against XAIX (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/epai-vs-xaix)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.