Data as of .
CHAT vs XA: which is really different?
CHAT and XA hold 5% of their weight in the same names.
ETFIQ Off-Index Score: XA scores higher
How much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?
A percentile among the 379 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
5% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, CHAT and XA hold 5% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | CHAT | XA |
|---|---|---|
| Crowdstrike Holdings Inc | 2.25% | 11.86% |
| Cloudflare Inc | 2.13% | 4.66% |
| First American Government Obligations Fund 12/01/2031 | 0.84% | 0.91% |
| Only in CHAT | Only in XA |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corp 6.92% | Palo Alto Networks Inc 12.91% |
| Alphabet Inc 5.69% | Okta Inc 6.91% |
| SK hynix Inc 4.40% | Fortinet Inc 5.87% |
| Microsoft Corp 3.72% | Datadog Inc 5.29% |
| Amazon.com Inc 3.42% | Rubrik Inc 4.81% |
| ASML Holding NV 3.27% | Zscaler Inc 4.16% |
| Advanced Micro Devices Inc 3.14% | F5 Inc 4.14% |
| Micron Technology Inc 3.09% | GEN DIGITAL INC 3.95% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHAT | XA | CHAT | XA | CHAT | XA | |
| 3 months | −12.2% | +27.7% | −14.5 pts | +25.4 pts | −9.8 pts | +30.2 pts |
| 6 months | +43.6% | not published | +25.6 pts | not published | +19.4 pts | not published |
| 1 year | +52.0% | not published | +35.5 pts | not published | +30.3 pts | not published |
| 3 years | +237.0% | not published | +158.6 pts | not published | +138.8 pts | not published |
| Since launch | +256.5% | +59.5% | +166.8 pts | +55.1 pts | +138.6 pts | +55.6 pts |
| CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF Holds 47 stocks in artificial intelligence, 48% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | XA Corgi AI Cybersecurity ETF Holds 26 stocks in artificial intelligence, 47% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Roundhill | Corgi |
| Theme | Artificial intelligence | Artificial intelligence |
| In the S&P 500 | 47.9% | 47.2% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 72.1% | 98.9% |
| In the Nasdaq-100 | 44.1% | 40.1% |
| Holdings | 47 | 26 |
| Top ten, share of the fund | 39.5% | 64.6% |
| Expense ratio | 0.75% | 0.35% |
| Fee for the differing part | 1.04% | 0.35% |
| Total return, 1 year | +52.0% | +59.5% (since launch on May 6, 2026) |
| vs the S&P 500 | +35.5 pts | +55.1 pts |
| vs the Nasdaq-100 | +30.3 pts | +55.6 pts |
| Below its high | −13.7% | −2.6% |
| Net assets | $1.8bn | $6m |
CHAT in plain words
By weight, 48% of CHAT's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 72%. The top ten holdings are 40% of the fund across 47 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 18, 2026. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 the fund returned +52.0% with distributions reinvested against +16.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 35.5 pts. It sits 13.7% below its all-time high of Jun 22, 2026.
XA in plain words
By weight, 47% of XA's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 99%. The top ten holdings are 65% of the fund across 26 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 18, 2026. Since it launched on May 6, 2026 the fund returned +59.5% with distributions reinvested against +4.3% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 55.1 pts.
Questions people ask
- Do CHAT and XA hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 5% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
- Which is more different from the S&P 500, CHAT or XA?
- CHAT has 48% of its weight in S&P 500 names and XA has 47%, so XA differs more from the index.
- Which is cheaper, CHAT or XA?
- CHAT charges 0.75% a year and XA charges 0.35%, so XA is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, CHAT against XA, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/chat-vs-xa Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.