Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
CGPT vs CHAT: Holdings Overlap & Returns
CGPT and CHAT hold 30% of their weight in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about CGPT and CHATNet assets: $1.2m on Oct 27, 2026 for VegaShares AI Inference ETF, and $1.7bn on Oct 28, 2026 for Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF.
25% of CGPT's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 75% is outside the index. Holdings as of Aug 31, 2026.
56% of CHAT's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 45% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 28, 2026.
Pair scorecard
Both cost 0.75% a year; CHAT is far larger, $1.7bn against $1.2m.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | CGPT | CHAT |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | not published | +27.8% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its all-time high | 19.2%, high on Sep 22, 2026 | 20.0%, high on Jun 22, 2026 |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | AI infrastructure and chips | Artificial intelligence |
| Against the S&P 500, 1 year | ahead by 14.1 pts | |
| Its benchmark, total return, 1 year | +13.7% | |
| Against its benchmark, 1 year | ahead by 14.1 pts | |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.75% | 0.75% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $1.2m | $1.7bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 30% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 58% | 42% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 28, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, CGPT and CHAT hold 30% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 28, 2026.
half
30% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Window by window
| Total return | vs its benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | CGPT | CHAT | CGPT | CHAT |
| 3 months | – | +11.7% | – | +5.6 pts vs VOO |
| 6 months | – | +8.9% | – | −0.2 pts vs VOO |
| 1 year | – | +27.8% | – | +14.1 pts vs VOO |
| 3 years | – | +237.4% | – | +141.9 pts vs VOO |
| Since launchNot the same days: CGPT Aug 2026 · CHAT May 2023 | −16.1% | +230.5% | not measured | +137.6 pts vs VOO |
– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →
Side by side
As of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
30% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
CGPT
By weight, 25% of CGPT's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 86%. The top ten holdings are 58% of the fund across 11 positions, as filed for Aug 31, 2026. Since it first traded on Aug 13, 2026 the fund returned −16.1% with distributions reinvested. It sits 19.2% below its all-time high of Sep 22, 2026.
CHAT
By weight, 56% of CHAT's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 71%. The top ten holdings are 42% of the fund across 39 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 28, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned +27.8% with distributions reinvested against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Total Return Index, so a holder was ahead by 14.1 pts. It sits 20.0% below its all-time high of Jun 22, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Do CGPT and CHAT hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 30% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, CGPT against CHAT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/cgpt-vs-chat
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). CGPT against CHAT. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/cgpt-vs-chat
[CGPT against CHAT (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/cgpt-vs-chat)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.