Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Thematic ETFs

BOTZ vs GDXJ: Holdings Overlap & Returns

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, BOTZ returned −10.2% to GDXJ's +14.8%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about BOTZ and GDXJ

Net assets: $3.3bn on Oct 12, 2026 for Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF, and $7.6bn on Oct 27, 2026 for VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF.

At a glance
18.6%
BOTZ in the S&P 500
0.0%
GDXJ in the S&P 500
−10.2%
BOTZ total return, 1 year
+14.8%
GDXJ total return, 1 year
BOTZ · 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 81% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
81% of its weight is outside the S&P 50019% of BOTZ's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 81% is outside the index. Holdings as of May 31, 2026.19%81%in the S&P 500of its weight outside the S&P 500active share 88% · top ten 59% of the fund · 61 holdings as filed for May 31, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 19% in81% of its weight is outside the S&P 50019% of BOTZ's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 81% is outside the index. Holdings as of May 31, 2026.19%81%inoutside the S&P 500active share 88% · Nasdaq-100: 19% in

19% of BOTZ's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 81% is outside the index. Holdings as of May 31, 2026.

GDXJ · 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 100% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
100% of its weight is outside the S&P 5000% of GDXJ's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 22, 2026.0%100%0% of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 41% of the fund · 156 holdings as published by its issuer for Oct 22, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 0% in100% of its weight is outside the S&P 5000% of GDXJ's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 22, 2026.0%100%0% of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · Nasdaq-100: 0% in

0% of GDXJ's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 22, 2026.

Pair scorecard

GDXJ costs 0.16 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 25.0 points; GDXJ is 2.5 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

BOTZ vs GDXJ: Holdings Overlap & Returns
MeasureBOTZGDXJ
Return
Total return, 1 year−10.2%+14.8%
Drawdown
Below its all-time high18.2%, high on May 13, 202633.1%, high on Feb 27, 2026
Against its benchmark
What it tracksRobotics and automationGold miners
Its benchmark, total return, 1 year+13.4%
Against its benchmark, 1 yearahead by 1.4 pts
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.68%0.52%
Net assets, as of Oct 12, 2026$3.3bn$8.3bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Sep 23, 2016 to Oct 23, 2026 · 526 weekly returns
BOTZ GDXJ
Return
Total return edge GDXJ +125.3% +155.3%
Annualized edge GDXJ +8.4% +9.7%
Price return edge GDXJ (slight) +116.2% +118.7%
Risk
Volatility edge BOTZ 25.6% 42.1%
Max drawdown edge GDXJ (slight) −55.4% −54.1%
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge GDXJ (slight) 0.34 0.38
Sortino edge GDXJ (slight) 0.50 0.54
Calmar edge GDXJ 0.15 0.18
Reading

GDXJ returned more: +155.3% to +125.3%. BOTZ swung less: 25.6% to 42.1%. GDXJ fell slightly less at its worst: −54.1% to −55.4%.

Full scorecard

9 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: BOTZ vs GDXJ: Holdings Overlap & Returns
MeasureBOTZGDXJEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+125.3%+155.3%GDXJPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+8.4%+9.7%GDXJTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+116.2%+118.7%GDXJ (slight)Price change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility25.6%42.1%BOTZSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation17.7%29.4%BOTZLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−55.4%−54.1%GDXJ (slight)Deepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.340.38GDXJ (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.500.54GDXJ (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Calmar0.150.18GDXJAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 526 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, BOTZ and GDXJ hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first BOTZ GDXJ
Only in one fund ↓
Only in BOTZ
KEYENCE CORPORATION 9.30%
ABB Ltd 9.03%
FANUC CORPORATION 8.98%
NVIDIA CORPORATION 8.28%
INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC. 6.14%
Shenzhen Inovance Technology Co., Ltd 4.32%
SMC CORPORATION 4.01%
DAIFUKU CO., LTD. 3.52%
Only in GDXJ
Alamos Gold Inc 6.86%
Equinox Gold Corp 6.08%
Coeur Mining Inc 5.92%
Endeavour Mining Plc 5.76%
Iamgold Corp 5.19%
Industrias Penoles Sab De Cv 2.58%
First Majestic Silver Corp 2.27%
Hecla Mining Co 2.26%
Check overlap with more funds →

Window by window

Window by window: BOTZ vs GDXJ: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Total returnvs its benchmark
WindowBOTZGDXJBOTZGDXJ
3 months+1.0%+9.9%not measured+5.5 pts vs ACWI
6 months−8.8%−8.0%not measured−15.4 pts vs ACWI
1 year−10.2%+14.8%not measured+1.4 pts vs ACWI
3 years+53.7%+220.2%not measured+131.3 pts vs ACWI
Since launchNot the same days: BOTZ Sep 2016 · GDXJ Nov 2009+140.2%+44.9%not measurednot measured

Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF · Holds 61 stocks in robotics and automation, 19% of its weight in S&P 500 companies GDXJ VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF · Holds 156 stocks in gold miners, 0% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
Theme Robotics and automation Gold miners
In the S&P 500 18.6% 0.0%
Active share vs the S&P 500 88.2% 100.0%
In the Nasdaq-100 18.6% 0.0%
Holdings 61 156
Top ten, share of the fund 58.7% 40.8%
Expense ratio 0.68% 0.52%
Fee for the differing part 0.77% 0.52%
Total return, 1 year −10.2% +14.8%
vs its benchmark not measured +1.4 pts vs ACWI
Below its high −18.2% −33.1%
Net assets, BOTZ as of Oct 12, 2026 and GDXJ as of Oct 27, 2026 $3.3bn $7.6bn

As of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Alert

GDXJ flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
BOTZ

By weight, 19% of BOTZ's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 88%. The top ten holdings are 59% of the fund across 61 positions, as filed for May 31, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned −10.2% with distributions reinvested. It sits 18.2% below its all-time high of May 13, 2026.

GDXJ

By weight, 0% of GDXJ's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 41% of the fund across 156 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned +14.8% with distributions reinvested against +13.4% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI Index, so a holder was ahead by 1.4 pts. It sits 33.1% below its all-time high of Feb 27, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do BOTZ and GDXJ hold the same stocks?
By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, BOTZ or GDXJ?
BOTZ has 19% of its weight in S&P 500 names and GDXJ has 0%, so GDXJ differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, BOTZ or GDXJ?
BOTZ charges 0.68% a year and GDXJ charges 0.52%, so GDXJ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, BOTZ against GDXJ, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/botz-vs-gdxj

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.