Data as of .
AUMI vs SILJ: which is really different?
AUMI and SILJ hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and SILJ returned more over the year.
ETFIQ Off-Index Score: AUMI scores higher
How much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?
A percentile among the 379 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, AUMI and SILJ hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in AUMI | Only in SILJ |
|---|---|
| Endeavour Mining PLC 5.33% | Hecla Mining Co 10.49% |
| DPM Metals Inc 5.26% | COEUR MINING INC. 10.38% |
| Anglogold Ashanti Plc 4.91% | First Majestic Silver Corp 10.35% |
| IAMGOLD Corp 4.86% | Wheaton Precious Metals Corp 5.83% |
| Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd 4.76% | SSR Mining Inc 4.81% |
| Kinross Gold Corp 4.59% | Aya Gold & Silver Inc 3.91% |
| Alamos Gold Inc 4.45% | Boliden AB 3.89% |
| Northern Star Resources Ltd 4.34% | Endeavour Silver Corp 3.73% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUMI | SILJ | AUMI | SILJ | AUMI | SILJ | |
| 3 months | +17.9% | +8.1% | +15.7 pts | +5.9 pts | +20.4 pts | +10.6 pts |
| 6 months | +18.6% | +14.8% | +0.6 pts | −3.3 pts | −5.6 pts | −9.5 pts |
| 1 year | +38.2% | +53.2% | +21.6 pts | +36.6 pts | +16.4 pts | +31.4 pts |
| 3 years | not published | +263.6% | not published | +185.2 pts | not published | +165.5 pts |
| Since launch | +286.4% | +75.8% | +218.6 pts | −506.2 pts | +204.9 pts | −1057.0 pts |
| AUMI Themes Gold Miners ETF Holds 31 stocks in gold miners, 0% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | SILJ Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF Holds 70 stocks in silver miners, 0% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Themes | Amplify |
| Theme | Gold miners | Silver miners |
| In the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| In the Nasdaq-100 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Holdings | 31 | 70 |
| Top ten, share of the fund | 46.9% | 59.7% |
| Expense ratio | 0.35% | 0.69% |
| Fee for the differing part | 0.35% | 0.69% |
| Total return, 1 year | +38.2% | +53.2% |
| vs the S&P 500 | +21.6 pts | +36.6 pts |
| vs the Nasdaq-100 | +16.4 pts | +31.4 pts |
| Below its high | −19.2% | −25.1% |
| Net assets | $26m | $3.9bn |
AUMI in plain words
By weight, 0% of AUMI's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 47% of the fund across 31 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 the fund returned +38.2% with distributions reinvested against +16.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 21.6 pts. It sits 19.2% below its all-time high of Feb 27, 2026.
SILJ in plain words
By weight, 0% of SILJ's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 60% of the fund across 70 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 21, 2026. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 the fund returned +53.2% with distributions reinvested against +16.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 36.6 pts. It sits 25.1% below its all-time high of Feb 27, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Do AUMI and SILJ hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
- Which is more different from the S&P 500, AUMI or SILJ?
- AUMI has 0% of its weight in S&P 500 names and SILJ has 0%, so AUMI differs more from the index.
- Which is cheaper, AUMI or SILJ?
- AUMI charges 0.35% a year and SILJ charges 0.69%, so AUMI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, AUMI against SILJ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/aumi-vs-silj Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.