Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
AUMI vs SILJ: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, AUMI returned +22.6% to SILJ's +19.6%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about AUMI and SILJ
Net assets: $20m on Nov 4, 2026 for Themes Gold Miners ETF, and $2.9bn on Nov 3, 2026 for Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF.
0% of AUMI's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 4, 2026.
0% of SILJ's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 4, 2026.
Pair scorecard
AUMI costs 0.34 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 3.0 points; SILJ is far larger, $2.9bn against $19m.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | AUMI | SILJ |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +22.6% | +19.6% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its all-time high | 27.3%, high on Feb 27, 2026 | 39.4%, high on Feb 27, 2026 |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Gold miners | Silver miners |
| Its benchmark, total return, 1 year | +15.0% | |
| Against its benchmark, 1 year | ahead by 7.6 pts | |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.35% | 0.69% |
| Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026 | $19m | $2.9bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, AUMI and SILJ hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Nov 4, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Window by window
| Total return | vs its benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | AUMI | SILJ | AUMI | SILJ |
| 3 months | +2.4% | −12.0% | +3.7 pts vs ACWI | not measured |
| 6 months | −8.3% | −21.4% | −10.9 pts vs ACWI | not measured |
| 1 year | +22.6% | +19.6% | +7.6 pts vs ACWI | not measured |
| 3 years | – | +205.4% | – | not measured |
| Since launchNot the same days: AUMI Dec 2023 · SILJ Nov 2012 | +247.6% | +42.1% | +182.3 pts vs ACWI | not measured |
– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
AUMI
By weight, 0% of AUMI's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 47% of the fund across 30 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 4, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +22.6% with distributions reinvested against +15.0% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI Index, so a holder was ahead by 7.6 pts. It sits 27.3% below its all-time high of Feb 27, 2026.
SILJ
By weight, 0% of SILJ's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 60% of the fund across 66 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 4, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +19.6% with distributions reinvested. It sits 39.4% below its all-time high of Feb 27, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Do AUMI and SILJ hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, AUMI against SILJ, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/aumi-vs-silj
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). AUMI against SILJ. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/aumi-vs-silj
[AUMI against SILJ (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/aumi-vs-silj)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.