Data as of .
AIQ vs URA: which is really different?
AIQ holds 55.9% of its weight in S&P 500 companies and URA 0.0%.
ETFIQ Off-Index Score: URA scores higher
How much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?
A percentile among the 371 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, AIQ and URA hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in AIQ | Only in URA |
|---|---|
| PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC-A 3.72% | CAMECO CORP 22.39% |
| MICROSOFT CORP 3.57% | SPROTT PHYSICAL URANIUM TR 6.46% |
| SPACE EXPLORATION TECHN-CL A 3.51% | NEXGEN ENERGY LTD 5.88% |
| ORACLE CORP 3.44% | OKLO INC 5.12% |
| TESLA INC 3.14% | URANIUM ENERGY CORP 4.72% |
| NETFLIX INC 3.08% | NAC KAZATOMPROM JSC-GDR REGS 4.42% |
| AMAZON.COM INC 3.02% | PALADIN ENERGY LTD 3.15% |
| META PLATFORMS INC 2.94% | ENERGY FUELS INC 3.09% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 11, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AIQ | URA | AIQ | URA | AIQ | URA | |
| 3 months | 0.0% | −4.4% | −3.3 pts | −7.7 pts | +0.8 pts | −3.6 pts |
| 6 months | +32.3% | −11.7% | +16.3 pts | −27.7 pts | +11.6 pts | −32.4 pts |
| 1 year | +35.7% | +7.0% | +18.2 pts | −10.5 pts | +12.7 pts | −15.9 pts |
| 3 years | +127.6% | +100.1% | +49.7 pts | +22.2 pts | +32.5 pts | +5.0 pts |
| Since launch | +337.9% | −34.6% | +119.2 pts | −758.0 pts | −8.8 pts | −1460.8 pts |
| AIQ Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF Holds 89 stocks in artificial intelligence, 56% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | URA Global X Uranium ETF Holds 58 stocks in nuclear and uranium, 0% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Global X | Global X |
| Theme | Artificial intelligence | Nuclear and uranium |
| In the S&P 500 | 55.9% | 0.0% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 69.7% | 100.0% |
| In the Nasdaq-100 | 47.5% | 0.0% |
| Holdings | 89 | 58 |
| Top ten, share of the fund | 32.2% | 60.9% |
| Expense ratio | 0.68% | 0.69% |
| Fee for the differing part | 0.98% | 0.69% |
| Total return, 1 year | +35.7% | +7.0% |
| vs the S&P 500 | +18.2 pts | −10.5 pts |
| vs the Nasdaq-100 | +12.7 pts | −15.9 pts |
| Below its high | −8.8% | −50.4% |
AIQ in plain words
By weight, 56% of AIQ's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 70%. The top ten holdings are 32% of the fund across 89 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 11, 2026. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 the fund returned +35.7% with distributions reinvested against +17.5% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 18.2 pts. It sits 8.8% below its all-time high of Jun 2, 2026.
URA in plain words
By weight, 0% of URA's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 61% of the fund across 58 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 11, 2026. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 the fund returned +7.0% with distributions reinvested against +17.5% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 10.5 pts. It sits 50.4% below its all-time high of Feb 2, 2011.
Questions people ask
- Which is more different from the S&P 500, AIQ or URA?
- AIQ has 56% of its weight in S&P 500 names and URA has 0%, so URA differs more from the index.
- Which is cheaper, AIQ or URA?
- AIQ charges 0.68% a year and URA charges 0.69%, so AIQ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, AIQ against URA, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/aiq-vs-ura Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.