Data as of .
YBTC vs YETH: which paid, and which earned it?
Over the year YETH paid 29.0% of its price in cash against YBTC’s 24.9%, though YBTC returned more with it reinvested.
ETFIQ Return Stability Score: YETH scores higher
Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?
A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, YBTC and YETH hold 99% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | YBTC | YETH |
|---|---|---|
| United States Treasury Bill 10/08/2026 | 95.71% | 94.47% |
| First American Government Obligations Fu | 4.11% | 5.03% |
| Only in YBTC | Only in YETH |
|---|---|
| IBIT 10/16/2026 45.86 C 4.54% | ETHA 10/16/2026 19.72 C 6.81% |
| IBIT 09/25/2026 48.27 C -0.61% | ETHA 09/25/2026 21.02 C -1.04% |
| IBIT 10/16/2026 45.86 P -3.75% | ETHA 10/16/2026 19.72 P -5.27% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YBTC | YETH | YBTC | YETH | YBTC | YETH | |
| 3 months | +13.7% | +28.9% | 7.5% | 11.4% | −15.5 pts | −25.8 pts |
| 6 months | +0.6% | +7.6% | 14.8% | 20.5% | −15.1 pts | −16.2 pts |
| 1 year | −38.2% | −39.9% | 24.9% | 29.0% | −7.1 pts | +2.8 pts |
| Since launch | +28.5% | −29.8% | 101.4% | 68.4% | −68.7 pts | −36.9 pts |
| YBTC Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF Covered call on IBIT, paying weekly | YETH Roundhill Ether Covered Call Strategy ETF Covered call on ETHA, paying weekly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Roundhill | Roundhill |
| Strategy | covered call | covered call |
| Benchmark | Bitcoin (IBIT) | Ether (ETHA) |
| Pays | weekly | weekly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 29.5% | 36.6% |
| Expense ratio | 0.95% | 0.96% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 24.9% | 29.0% |
| Price change, 1 year | −60.1% | −66.4% |
| Total return, 1 year | −38.2% | −39.9% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | −31.1% | −42.6% |
| Ahead or behind | −7.1 pts | +2.8 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 974 days | 744 days |
| Net assets | $142m | $67m |
YBTC in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, YBTC paid 24.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 60.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −38.2%. Bitcoin (IBIT) returned −31.1% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 7.1 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 29.5%, paid weekly.
YETH in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, YETH paid 29.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 66.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −39.9%. Ether (ETHA) returned −42.6% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 2.8 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 36.6%, paid weekly.
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, YBTC or YETH?
- Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, YBTC paid 24.9% of its starting price in cash and YETH paid 29.0%, so YETH paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, YBTC or YETH?
- With every distribution reinvested, YBTC returned −38.2% and YETH returned −39.9% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so YBTC returned more.
- Which is cheaper, YBTC or YETH?
- YBTC charges 0.95% a year and YETH charges 0.96%, so YBTC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, YBTC against YETH, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/ybtc-vs-yeth Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.