Data as of .
XISE vs XRMI: which paid, and which earned it?
Over the year XRMI paid 12.1% of its price in cash against XISE’s 6.5%, and returned more with it reinvested.
ETFIQ Return Stability Score: XRMI scores higher
Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?
A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, XISE and XRMI hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in XISE | Only in XRMI |
|---|---|
| 2027-09-17 State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust C 0.08 98.96% | NVIDIA CORP 8.27% |
| 2027-09-17 State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust P 761.61 5.02% | APPLE INC 7.54% |
| US Dollar 1.19% | MICROSOFT CORP 5.63% |
| U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 01/28/2027 0.55% | AMAZON.COM INC 3.82% |
| U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 02/25/2027 0.55% | ALPHABET INC-CL A 3.15% |
| U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 10/29/2026 0.55% | BROADCOM INC 2.61% |
| U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 12/01/2026 0.55% | ALPHABET INC-CL C 2.50% |
| U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 12/31/2026 0.55% | META PLATFORMS INC 2.26% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XISE | XRMI | XISE | XRMI | XISE | XRMI | |
| 3 months | +1.2% | +3.5% | 2.0% | 3.0% | −1.1 pts | +1.2 pts |
| 6 months | +4.9% | +8.9% | 3.6% | 6.3% | −13.2 pts | −9.1 pts |
| 1 year | +6.1% | +10.3% | 6.5% | 12.1% | −10.5 pts | −6.3 pts |
| 3 years | +20.9% | +27.2% | 19.1% | 33.3% | −57.5 pts | −51.2 pts |
| Since launch | +21.1% | +17.0% | 19.2% | 43.8% | −57.0 pts | −66.1 pts |
| XISE FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - September Buffer with income on SPY, paying monthly | XRMI Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF Option income on SPY, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | First Trust | Global X |
| Strategy | buffer with income | option income |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 (SPY) | S&P 500 (SPY) |
| Pays | monthly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 6.0% | 12.3% |
| Expense ratio | 0.85% | 0.60% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 6.5% | 12.1% |
| Price change, 1 year | −0.6% | −2.4% |
| Total return, 1 year | +6.1% | +10.3% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +16.6% | +16.6% |
| Ahead or behind | −10.5 pts | −6.3 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | 95% |
| Age | 1096 days | 1849 days |
| Net assets | $32m | $60m |
XISE in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, XISE paid 6.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +6.1%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 10.5 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.0%, paid monthly.
XRMI in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, XRMI paid 12.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 2.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +10.3%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 6.2 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 12.3%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 95% of the distribution paid Aug 27, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, XISE or XRMI?
- Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, XISE paid 6.5% of its starting price in cash and XRMI paid 12.1%, so XRMI paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, XISE or XRMI?
- With every distribution reinvested, XISE returned +6.1% and XRMI returned +10.3% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so XRMI returned more.
- Which is cheaper, XISE or XRMI?
- XISE charges 0.85% a year and XRMI charges 0.60%, so XRMI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, XISE against XRMI, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/xise-vs-xrmi Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.