Data as of .
XIDE vs XYLG: which paid, and which earned it?
Over the year XYLG paid 13.2% of its price in cash against XIDE’s 6.3%, and returned more with it reinvested.
ETFIQ Return Stability Score: XYLG scores higher
Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?
A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, XIDE and XYLG hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in XIDE | Only in XYLG |
|---|---|
| 2026-12-18 State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust C 0.07 110.36% | NVIDIA CORP 8.20% |
| U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 11/27/2026 1.02% | APPLE INC 7.50% |
| 2026-12-18 State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust P 680.58 0.73% | MICROSOFT CORP 5.59% |
| U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 10/01/2026 0.51% | AMAZON.COM INC 3.81% |
| U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 10/29/2026 0.51% | ALPHABET INC-CL A 3.12% |
| US Dollar 0.49% | BROADCOM INC 2.59% |
| 2026-12-18 State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust P 612.52 -0.33% | ALPHABET INC-CL C 2.48% |
| 2026-12-18 State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust C 680.58 -13.29% | META PLATFORMS INC 2.24% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XIDE | XYLG | XIDE | XYLG | XIDE | XYLG | |
| 3 months | +1.6% | +3.6% | 1.5% | 1.3% | −0.7 pts | +1.3 pts |
| 6 months | +6.0% | +15.7% | 3.2% | 3.0% | −12.0 pts | −2.3 pts |
| 1 year | +6.5% | +17.2% | 6.3% | 13.2% | −10.1 pts | +0.7 pts |
| 3 years | not published | +60.9% | not published | 43.0% | not published | −17.5 pts |
| Since launch | +19.9% | +114.0% | 17.4% | 69.0% | −46.8 pts | −38.7 pts |
| XIDE FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - December Buffer with income on SPY, paying monthly | XYLG Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF Covered call on SPY, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | First Trust | Global X |
| Strategy | buffer with income | covered call |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 (SPY) | S&P 500 (SPY) |
| Pays | monthly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 6.2% | 4.4% |
| Expense ratio | 0.85% | 0.35% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 6.3% | 13.2% |
| Price change, 1 year | 0.0% | +2.6% |
| Total return, 1 year | +6.5% | +17.2% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +16.6% | +16.6% |
| Ahead or behind | −10.1 pts | +0.7 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | 80% |
| Age | 1005 days | 2188 days |
| Net assets | $23m | $65m |
XIDE in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, XIDE paid 6.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +6.5%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 10.1 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.2%, paid monthly.
XYLG in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, XYLG paid 13.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 2.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +17.2%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 0.7 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 4.4%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 80% of the distribution paid Aug 27, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, XIDE or XYLG?
- Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, XIDE paid 6.3% of its starting price in cash and XYLG paid 13.2%, so XYLG paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, XIDE or XYLG?
- With every distribution reinvested, XIDE returned +6.5% and XYLG returned +17.2% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so XYLG returned more.
- Which is cheaper, XIDE or XYLG?
- XIDE charges 0.85% a year and XYLG charges 0.35%, so XYLG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, XIDE against XYLG, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/xide-vs-xylg Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.